Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Mexicali crossing last year, undocumented aliens have no rights in this country, including human ones, sure nobody would be dishonest to get an advantage to stay here.
1 posted on 11/02/2011 8:03:14 PM PDT by moonshinner_09
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Liz; La Lydia; AuntB

Bring-hankies PING


2 posted on 11/02/2011 8:06:03 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09

“Capable”???? They’re ILLEGAL. Is THAT the standard they’re setting for their kids? BREAK THE LAW?


3 posted on 11/02/2011 8:06:32 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (A MUST WATCH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KeOLurcQaqI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09

Aw.

Boo-hoo. Send them back with their parents. They’ve got their anchor baby status to fall back on, but they should be with their family.

Keeping them here away from their parents is HEARTLESS.


4 posted on 11/02/2011 8:07:56 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09

They shouldn’t be here in the first place. Sorry, no symapthy here.


5 posted on 11/02/2011 8:08:17 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09
deemed "criminals" for being undocumented

Um... maybe because entering this country without the proper visas is a crime? And why aren't the children of illegals being deported with their parents?

6 posted on 11/02/2011 8:10:16 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09

This is RIDICULOUS and proves that there are idiots running the system. There is NO REASON why the children of ILLEGAL entrants cannot and should not be deported with the parents. The kids can have a US Birth Certificate and can produce it at the border when they turn 21 and decide at that time if they want to enter the USofA as ADULTS.

The PROBLEM is with the misappropriation and misunderstanding of US Citizenship ... these children should never have gotten US Citizenship unless their parents were US Citizens.

Congress has got to address this issue and stop providing citizenship to babies born in the USofA unless both parents are US Citizens. If the parents are not married and the Mother is not a US Citizen, the children should not be US Citizens. If they are married and either parent is a US Citizen, they have the choice of having the child be a US Citizen or not. And if one of the parents is not here legally, AND the parents are married, the non-legal should be given twelve or thirteen months to obtain legal status or be deported ... with or without the child, their choice.


7 posted on 11/02/2011 8:12:43 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (I am Roman Catholic, US Citizen, Patriot, TEA Party Alumni, Oath Keeper, Voter, Auburn Fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09; Tennessee Nana; RushIsMyTeddyBear; Cringing Negativism Network; unixfox

I recall reading somewhere that the law was actually quite clear, if only it were enforced.

Minor U.S. citizen children, MUST accompany their parents. When they turn eighteen they can petition to be issued a U.S. passport and come back here, but not before.


8 posted on 11/02/2011 8:13:10 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09
From the article:
We are not here to deal with immigration; we are here to reunify children [with parents]. That's our goal and that's our job. That's what social workers do.

And, that is commendable. But the article makes no mention of whether the child is also sent back if the parent is deported (and one can ask why the parent should not be deported).

If the parent is deported - which is the U.S.'s means of dealing with the crime - then the child, whether born here or not, should go along.

Isn't it a bit presumptuous of the government to assume the taxpayers should pick up the bill for the cost of "adopting" the child?

9 posted on 11/02/2011 8:24:34 PM PDT by frog in a pot (The IRS denies tax breaks to our domestic terrorists. WTH do we not deport them instead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09
What kind of parent abandons his/her own children in a foreign land. All they had to do was pack up the kids and all go home. We don't need irresponsible people like this coming into the country. We have more than enough of our own already.
10 posted on 11/02/2011 9:35:11 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09

Puh-leeze.

Free schools, free ER visits, free welfare

It’s time we end these incentives for lawbreaking.


11 posted on 11/02/2011 11:08:02 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson