Bring-hankies PING
“Capable”???? They’re ILLEGAL. Is THAT the standard they’re setting for their kids? BREAK THE LAW?
Aw.
Boo-hoo. Send them back with their parents. They’ve got their anchor baby status to fall back on, but they should be with their family.
Keeping them here away from their parents is HEARTLESS.
They shouldn’t be here in the first place. Sorry, no symapthy here.
Um... maybe because entering this country without the proper visas is a crime? And why aren't the children of illegals being deported with their parents?
This is RIDICULOUS and proves that there are idiots running the system. There is NO REASON why the children of ILLEGAL entrants cannot and should not be deported with the parents. The kids can have a US Birth Certificate and can produce it at the border when they turn 21 and decide at that time if they want to enter the USofA as ADULTS.
The PROBLEM is with the misappropriation and misunderstanding of US Citizenship ... these children should never have gotten US Citizenship unless their parents were US Citizens.
Congress has got to address this issue and stop providing citizenship to babies born in the USofA unless both parents are US Citizens. If the parents are not married and the Mother is not a US Citizen, the children should not be US Citizens. If they are married and either parent is a US Citizen, they have the choice of having the child be a US Citizen or not. And if one of the parents is not here legally, AND the parents are married, the non-legal should be given twelve or thirteen months to obtain legal status or be deported ... with or without the child, their choice.
I recall reading somewhere that the law was actually quite clear, if only it were enforced.
Minor U.S. citizen children, MUST accompany their parents. When they turn eighteen they can petition to be issued a U.S. passport and come back here, but not before.
And, that is commendable. But the article makes no mention of whether the child is also sent back if the parent is deported (and one can ask why the parent should not be deported).
If the parent is deported - which is the U.S.'s means of dealing with the crime - then the child, whether born here or not, should go along.
Isn't it a bit presumptuous of the government to assume the taxpayers should pick up the bill for the cost of "adopting" the child?
Puh-leeze.
Free schools, free ER visits, free welfare
It’s time we end these incentives for lawbreaking.