No one did, because Minor doesn’t say what the fevered birthers claim it says. If it had, either Hillary or the GOP would have cited it.
There is a reason no state legislature or state DA, no Congressman and no court pays attention to birthers. They have no case. Legally, their arguments are total hogwash.
A lot of money has been moved around under Barack Obama’s reign. Trillions. And, his blackness helped early on to grease the skids.
Even now, he is moving money around without congressional approval. It is sickening what the Communist democrat party has done to our nation and the level of debt it has piled on us.
I have been holding of on saying anything about your stance on MR Obama’s eligibility sir. Since I have a penchant for chewing out unprofessional officers I hope you are at least an 04 maybe an 06.
Use some blasted logic sir, read all the cited material, it will become obvious that Obama is not now eligible, was not eligible then, will not ever be eligible.
All those complicit in the fraud and the cover up should spend a very “long” time behind bars.
.....No one did, because Minor doesn’t say what the fevered birthers claim it says. If it had, either Hillary or the GOP would have cited it......
The GOP didn’t and still wont’t do anything becaue McCain would have been ineligible and they were afraid of being called racists and they never figured Obama could win they are poor excuse for human beings. Hillary didnt because Obama had enough on her to silence her look how he stole the nomination form her, and she didnt raise a peep.
....There is a reason no state legislature or state DA, no Congressman and no court pays attention to birthers. They have no case. Legally, their arguments are total hogwash....
Can you read minds now? Are you a Constitutional Attorney?
If it is not decided if the child of a US citizen and visitor is born in the US is a citizen how can arguments on the other side be hogwash? It is your arguments that are hogwash.
BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP
http://www.cis.org/birthright-citizenship
Wow. You said the same thing about the Birth certificate stuff! Do you just copy and paste this stuff??
Altering SCOTUS cases, is the topic Rogers, want to take a stab at why THOSE phrases were changed? Wanna take a stab at why they were returned to their original condition? Wanna discuss why someone would deliberately violate the law to do so?
Come on Rogers, we are waiting.
I see that you successfully hijacked this thread.
This thread is about the deliberate altering of published Supreme Court rulings. Prior threads contained many links to before and after images of the removed and restored images.
Saying that "no on did" doesn't help your credibility when it is obvious that someone did.
The question to you on this thread is who did it?
-PJ