[Political Junkie Too]

No one did, because Minor doesn’t say what the fevered birthers claim it says.

I see that you successfully hijacked this thread.

This thread is about the deliberate altering of published Supreme Court rulings. Prior threads contained many links to before and after images of the removed and restored images.

Saying that "no on did" doesn't help your credibility when it is obvious that someone did.

The question to you on this thread is who did it?

-PJ

[Mr Rogers]

PJ, not EVERYTHING is a conspiracy.

No one would gain anything by the “deliberate altering of published Supreme Court rulings” - which are published in many places, not just justica.

When I cite Minor, it comes from here - here being the first place I saw it on Google:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_ZS.html

And what was missing? The title. As if that would make any difference.