PJ, not EVERYTHING is a conspiracy.
No one would gain anything by the “deliberate altering of published Supreme Court rulings” - which are published in many places, not just justica.
When I cite Minor, it comes from here - here being the first place I saw it on Google:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_ZS.html
And what was missing? The title. As if that would make any difference.
The story is that it's not just Minor, but 25 other cases that refer to Minor. Did you not notice that?
The allegation in this story is that the references were removed while still tagging the articles as being complete texts.
Regardless of your opinion on the significance of the citations, do you deny that these changes took place?
-PJ