[rolling_stone]

.....No one did, because Minor doesn’t say what the fevered birthers claim it says. If it had, either Hillary or the GOP would have cited it......

The GOP didn’t and still wont’t do anything becaue McCain would have been ineligible and they were afraid of being called racists and they never figured Obama could win they are poor excuse for human beings. Hillary didnt because Obama had enough on her to silence her look how he stole the nomination form her, and she didnt raise a peep.

....There is a reason no state legislature or state DA, no Congressman and no court pays attention to birthers. They have no case. Legally, their arguments are total hogwash....

Can you read minds now? Are you a Constitutional Attorney?

If it is not decided if the child of a US citizen and visitor is born in the US is a citizen how can arguments on the other side be hogwash? It is your arguments that are hogwash.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP
http://www.cis.org/birthright-citizenship

[Mr Rogers]

“If it is not decided if the child of a US citizen and visitor is born in the US is a citizen”

Yeah, there is a big legal debate over that...bwahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!

[ydoucare]

Mr Rogers is absolutely correct in his analysis. Your post and links are once again long on unsubstantiated opinion and woefully short on the the facts and the law. Are you saying it is unsettled law that a person born of a citizen and an alien (legal or illegal) is a nbc?

There was just a FR thread on this topic. Read the Diaz-Salazar v INS or Nwankpa v Kissinger. Both are Court of Appeals cases. Both appeals were denied by SCOTUS. Which means they found it to be settled law between the circuits and no reversible error by the appeals court. I know there are at least a hundred cases like this in the 5th Circuit. Mr Rogers is correct that it well settled law and it you who is full of hogwash.