Replies

So the Waybackmachine is covering a$$ too, on the eligibility issue, trying to make people who have bothered to notice the shananigans look like morons. I’d be very interested to know which Obots noticed that the Waybackmachine gave a different error message 3 days after this guy filed his report, and argued that he was thus “mistaken”. Looks like they chose to mess with the wrong guy, because he noticed the asterisk that caused an abnormal/altered error message to be given instead.

The standard line from the Obots is that “birthers” consider every source that doesn’t agree with them as part of a vast conspiracy. A person dreads to say that the Waybackmachine can’t be trusted, because it sounds so far-fetched. But this guy has documented that they ARE messing with this stuff. They have the ability (and apparently motive) to manipulate all the parameters and have been caught doing so.

This case was to make it seem like they can’t show what was on the NY BOE page long ago, when in reality they are BLOCKING it from being shown. What would keep them from being able to create a snapshot of the NY BOE page as it is today and putting it into the archive as though it really was what was showing 5 years ago? What would keep them from literally “altering” history - just as the Passport Office, HDOH, and Selective Service have done?

We are genuinely living in a “1984” type scenario, where reality itself is being subjected to manipulation, to get us to believe against what we actually know. With this kind of stuff going on, who is credible? Anybody who cares about truth should find all this sobering - regardless of what they think of Obama’s eligibility. We are becoming a civilization that has no way of being sure what is real and what has been manipulated.

And as with the Justia thing, the Waybackmachine manipulation that has now been documented raises the question of why anybody would go to the trouble of manipulating these particular things, if there wasn’t something they wanted hidden.