Doesn’t she work for them ( or at least is paid by them)?
Thanks for posting this article - but you know it's gonna' make the PSD Freepers apoplectic....
Palin is right. I’m getting tired of the “media” playing around with all of the GOP candidates while not laying a glove on Obama. The “media” is using their smearing of the GOP candidates to fill their air time without having to address the Obama and ‘RAT scandals that are breaking out all over the place.
Add to it that the banner at the bottom of the screen on her two last appearanced did not title her a a Fox News Contributor even as they still labeled all the other regulars as such.
Does it mean anything? Only she and Fox News know for sure and I am comfortable with waiting until either one makes the decision to let the rest of the prognosticators know.
Michele caused her own problems.
First, Perry’s entry hurt her polls.
Then she way overstated her case against him on Gardasil. Just took herself right over a cliff and appeared desperate and demagogic.
Fox News is pro Romney, I believe.
But what’s the point? Do you work for them for many months and gladly take their pay, then suddenly go “well, a pox on you Fox News for your reportage and your opinion pieces, so long, as I now run for President and can’t have you paying me anymore”?
If this speculation is even true...not about what she said but about her plans.
The title doesn’t match up with the content of the article. There’s discussion about what is said/done on Fox, i.e., O’Reilly, Greta, etc., but only SP references are to a) media, generally, and b) Juan Williams who is not Fox News, but merely a contributor like she is. There’s not a SP quote attacking Fox News that I can read here to support the headline.
She then went on to suggest that it took the straw poll in Florida to make [Cain] “flavor of the week” for the media, when in reality it was his qualities as an American which made him appealing to voters.
As usual, the media chose to pick up on one line of Palin’s commentary — i.e., the suggestion that Herman Cain was “flavor of the week.” As a result, various newspaper articles and major media outlets began reporting her context inaccurately.
And it wasn't just the left-wing media that went after Sarah, who was CRITICIZING THE MEDIA FOR THE WAY THEY TREATED CAIN. It was also all the Palin-haters in the forum here. Ironically, while attacking Sarah and misrepresenting what she said, they bashed Sarah FOR ATTACKING CAIN and being a bad conservative.
I've never seen so many people attacking Sarah in particular, under the pretence that Sarah was bad for attacking THEIR candidates.
Let's at least get the facts straight. And you certainly won't do that by quoting the MSM, without doing a little checking first.
Fox is supposed to proclaim itself in the bag for Sarah? C’mon. You don’t really believe that, do you? Oh, that’s right — you do.
Many other comments over on this posting if anyone is interested in reading them.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2786471/posts?
Why is Sarah Palin accusing Megyn Kelly and Fox News of “misinformation” about her?
BTW, Try : "Employer Fox News"
I took that comment to include ALL the media, not just Fox News.
So where did she “attack” Fox News?
Another word that I believe is being grossly overused today. Seems any disagreement or critisism, no matter how mild or even incidental, is quickly labeled an "ATTACK".
Our language seems to be losing all rational meaning.