Run Sarah, Run!
Posted on 09/25/2011 12:42:05 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
Well, that attitude will certainly influence people to your position...
If he does he will be serving illegally just as Obama is illegally serving as President of the U.S. We all know liberals and Democrats don’t give a rats rear about the Constitution or abiding by the rule of law perhaps Republicans won’t either.
Either way the issue is not going away until it is resolved.
Actually, I think Cain COULD beat Obama, were it not for the detail that he can’t beat Romney.
Aside from the fact that Romney and the complicit media will never let anyone forget Cain’s lack of political experience, his age, and his medical history —
Obama’s running; no need for anyone to show up for the Dem primaries. The open primaries in most states will be attended by Republicans, brainless moderates and “independents” and anybody who wants Obama to face the weakest possible GOP candidate.
Cain’s not winning that. Get the pixie dust out of your eyes. If the polls say it’s close you will be trampled flatter than a Perry punchline, by crossovers on Primary Day. Dems want the closest thing to Obama and they will vote Romney wherever they can.
They're starting to show their faces again.
I threw in my (rare) two cents on a Perry thread today, and the claws came out like you wouldn't believe. Although I simply echoed the responses of 95% of the posters on the thread, I nevertheless got special treatment.
Ah well. They sure learned me for daring to open my big mouth.
Run Sarah, Run!
I think that a Cain or a Palin would both have the sense to take that approach.
Oh yes - and come 2012 the clowny politicians and media
will be so confused and befuddled. They just don’t get
common sense...
P.S. Hubby just said Michelle will be on Extreme Makeover
in 5 minutes...speaking of clowns...
Off your nut as usual.
I think you would really benefit by taking a break from all things Palin. You've been having daily conniptions and heart attacks about her for months on end.
“And, what EXACTLY is your problem with any of what she said in that interview?? Huh??”
I don’t have a problem with the content of what she said. I also agree with Perry wrt Romney’s flipfloping. It’s just that after 8 years of Dubya’s mumbling and fumbling, we don’t need another mumblefumbler at the top of the ticket.
Another sucker heard from...I don’t blame you for taking this position...what else could you do?
Except their past will tell you if you're being lied to. If someone claims they'll clean up DC, have they done anything like that before or been buds with the elites? The past IS important. It tells you connections and where their allegiance is.
Because she hasn't called you and told you personally?
“Cheney bailed out of Yale and transferred to U of Wyoming, and no one made a big deal out of that. Harry Truman finished up at high school, and he would be scads better than any Dem candidate over the last 30 years.”
The reason why people brought up Palin’s academic record instead of Cheney’s is because everything fits the type. She can’t articulate very well, didn’t complete her term, reality TV star... and so it’s not a surprise that she also has a poor academic record. You can try to explain away one thing, but it’s the general pattern that counts.
You in Post 475 that was removed: Oh, I forgot. Yoy were a boob then too. I never wrote that Stephen signed to do a nudie film (prove me wromg and I'll quit FR forever).
You're still here. You are not a man of your word so who would take your opinion seriously?
Obama should not be President now.
So could I. Doesn't matter to me what order they are in, they are our best bet for defeating Obama/Clinton. I have a gut feeling that Obama is going to replace Biden on the ticket with Hillary Clinton. This will prop him up somewhat with those low poll numbers. Wouldn't be surprised if Obama cuts the deal shortly in order to keep her from challenging him for the nomination.
I'm talking about the fact that you singled out Palin supporters for sole and special criticism, in regards to flaming posts.
Of all supporter contingents on this website, we Palin supporters have been taking more flak, for a longer period of time, than any other group. We even had to borrow a term from Dubya's days in office to describe it - PDS. Next to Obama, no other political figure has been more vilified and spat upon, on Free Republic, than Sarah Palin.
If you've really defended Palin "from the beginning" as you say, then you're well aware of the fact that her supporters didn't do anything to start the incessant warfare that has sprung up between her supporters and detractors. We simply committed the unforgivable crime of honestly admiring her, and for having the temerity to do so enthusiastically.
Even worse, we actually had the gall to defend her against malicious gossip-mongering and ad hominem attacks.
Alright, I think I got that out of my system. It wasn't aimed at you personally, but you sort of struck a nerve there. I understand your doubts about everything that's occurring, but hang in there. We've got a long way to go, and I believe that Sarah Palin will lead as always, in the coming difficult months.
Amen to that...got the bruises to prove it...:oP
I think ari-freedom should follow pissant. He is very insulting and annoying.
He may be pissant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
