Posted on 09/25/2011 12:42:05 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
You obviously don’t listen to her much. Again, I support your right to prefer whoever you like, but obvious misstatements of fact concerning easily observed facts such as the quality of her voice will only hurt your persuasive effect in this forum (shrug).
[Really? So, you haven’t been bothered by all of the nasty, snarling posts by PDSers on the Palin threads over the last two and a half years?]
I have defended Sarah from the beginning, always, and I still do. I have also defended other candidates so I don’t know what double standard you are talking about. I think it is a mistake for conservatives to be doing the liberals dirty work for them.
[Or the attacks that are routinely leveled against anyone who dares to disagree with Perry on the Perry threads?]
I try to shutout all the negative posters who have an obvious agenda. I like to have an open, honest discussion about the candidates and issues. I think some of the attacks on Perry have been unfair. I also think that he was awful in the debate the other night, which makes me question whether he can beat Obama. I have always had some issues with Perry’s record, but none that I thought were disqualifying from the Presidency.
[Sounds to me like you’re harboring some double standards.]
Nope, I can support Sarah, but have my doubts about whether she can actually win. I also have my doubts about other candidates. I appreciate open and honest discussion so we can get the best candidate possible.
My goal is to nominate the most conservative candidate possible who can beat Obama. Romney is not an option.
I'm curious...on what basis do you make that argument?
Thirty days hath September, April, June and November.....
The high pitched voice of Palin is of a woman, get over it,
I love women Voices!!!!
“And we need Rubio for veep.”
If Rubio ever does become the “veep”, I hope he’ll be content with that because he is not a natural born citizen and does not qualify to be President of the U.S at the moment.
The issue needs to be openly discussed and resolved because he may very well make a good President or V.P.
Just curious....I know that you don't like Palin, and that you've been haunting the Palin threads crusading against her for years now - but have you taken the time to watch The Undefeated yourself?
Er..wrong one to reply to..I was defending her :-)
And, what EXACTLY is your problem with any of what she said in that interview?? Huh??
Btw, she was misdiagnosed and was stage 4 by the time they found it was cancer. Her death could have been prevented had she been diagnosed correctly.
Then he said that Americans who can't feed their families are heartless if they don't want to pay to educate illegals.
When a candidate starts sounding like the left, and writes EO's , like Obama, he's done.
Sounds like someone needs his pacifier, and a diaper change.
No matter whom she endorses, if she’s not in, it’s going to be Romney. If she announces she’s sitting it out in 2012, she will have said in effect, “Romney’s The One.”
I know she would not endorse him in the primaries. But if she doesn’t run she gives him the win, because nobody else is capable of knocking him out.
Right on the money. Hypotheticals are permissible if questioning an expert witness, and only in the area of expertise. Otherwise, speculation fails, too open-ended. Besides, Palin’s been carefully avoiding “establishment” merit badges. She’s not playing their game, so the hypothetical is an unlikely occurance to begin with.
No, because anyone can have a person make a movie and only point out the good things while leaving out the non positive things. I am also not going to pay for a political commercial.
That movie is the past, remote from what is going on now.
I am very familiar with her whole record. Sarah has some good qualities, but she appears to be unsure of her plans.
She is as good as the rest, but I will call her The Unproven, because she has yet to jump in and convince me to vote for her. Not participating in the debates and speaking from the safety of the sidelines is not convincing.
I already know that Perry is not a person I would vote for. So the debates are important.
I don’t care about the past except when it concerns policy, I care about what a person will do from here forward.
"The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
The Supreme court case of 1875 Minor V Happersett, 88,U.S. 162 set precedent that has not been overturned that natural born citizen is defined as born on U.S. soil to two citizen parents. Rubio does not meet that requirement like it or not.
http://www.youtube.com/user/82009pol#p/f/40/aIUSSWJSeV4
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.