"Since Jul 6, 2011"
Look, a N00b Perrysite!
Enjoy your astroturf.
Posted on 09/03/2011 10:30:52 PM PDT by smoothsailing
September 3, 2011
Promising she was ready to have a "adult conversation" about the specifics of what needed to be done to right America, Palin set a marker for herself:
"It requires deeds not words, it's not enough for politicians to throw around some vague generalities..."
And then went on to speak in... vague generalities. (Note: All quotes were taken directly as she spoke, and might not be completely word-for-word accurate.)
Her five point plan could have been taken from just about any candidates' Standard Stump Speech, and I include Jon Huntsman when I say "any candidate."
Here are some of the detailed, specific non-vague-generalities highlights:
So far it's a "bona fide workin' man's plan" which is all about "empowerment.""The way forward is no more politics as usual."
"All power not specifically delegated to the Federal government by the Constitution is reserved for the states, or we the people... so let's enforce the 10th amendment."
"We must repeal obamacare."
"Get the government out of the way, let the private sector breathe and expand..."
"No more runaway debt, we must priorize and cut. Cancel unused stimulus funds."
"The reality is we will have entitlement reform, either we do it ourselves or the world capital markets will."
Now, this advocacy for entitlement reform is semi-gutsy, but it is obviously not "detailed." And in fact most candidates talk of "reforming" entitlements. Few are very specific.
"We have the highest federal corporate tax rates in the world, do you know it's higher than China?"
Okay, I do not believe a single candidate does not advocate lowering the corporate tax rate. Including Huntsman.
She wants to cut it down to zero, which is at least a detail, and is at least not a gimme.
To pay for this, she wants to eliminate "loopholes and bailouts and corporate cronyism."
Remember, she's going to give you an "adult conversation," rich in detail, unlike other poltiicians, who speak in "vague generalities."
This speech was said to be two things, and hinted to a third.
First, it was supposed to be a "major announcement." If there was a major announcement here, I missed it entirely.
Second, it was supposed to be a "full-throated defense of the Tea Party." It wasn't. It was platitudes and bromides sprinkled with flattering the crowd.
What would a "full-throated (and "major") defense of the Tea Party" sound like? Well, for one, I'd think it should be persuasive to non-Tea Partiers. For another, I think it would be thoughtful, rather than off-the-cuff standard flatteries. For a third, I think it should be novel or new.
I could imagine a good speech about the Tea Party. I could imagine a speech going all the way back to the Town Halls during and after the Revolutionary War, when citizens were actually engaged in what their government and their country would be. I could imagine a speech detailing the patriotic conscientiousness of making sure that what was won by blood should not be lost by disregard.
And I could imagine such a speech noting that for decades, American citizens had largely abandoned this commitment to engagement with their own political fates, and a Media-Government Elite filled the vacuum, and over time, became less and less connected with the citizens they were supposedly serving.
And I could imagine a speech then noting that this Elite, having gotten cozy deciding the fate of the nation, reacts hysterically and angrily when citizens decide they want to take back their God-given right to decide the course of human events for themselves, viciously attacking Americans who had the audacity to say "We're taking our responsibilities as citizens seriously again, after too long leaving it them to you, those who craved power and assumed it and now cry like stuck animals when we attempt to take back what was always ours."
Maybe you don't think that's good. Maybe that strikes you as pedestrian and done to death.
But if you're going to claim a "full throated defense of the Tea Party," shouldn't there be something beyond the typical praise of the "workin' man" and the standard-issue statements that we're the ones who actually produce wealth?
That stuff is true. But it's unremarkable. Certainly it fails to live up to the advance billing.
Third, what was implied was that Palin would make an announcement about her candidacy. She hinted about this "See you on September 3rd!," a campaign-like commercial promised.
And she never said publicly, "Although I am giving a policy speech, I will not be making any kind of declaration on September 3rd." Such a statement was leaked by "sources close to the governor," but is there something "unconservative" about simply making one's plans known?
So that other people don't waste their time?
Instead, after the encouragement of interest, and the cultivation of speculation about what that "major announcement" might be, it was a very standard-issue and not-particularly-important or novel stump speech.
Some might find this sort of coyness and games-playing "brilliant" or the like. I don't.
Some may claim she "played a trick on the media." Yes, the media. And everyone else too.
David Letterman used to make a point of wasting "network time" on dumb stuff. The in-joke was "Can you believe we are doing a network broadcast and yet we're just showing videos of squirrels?"
I found that funny, for a time. Until I realized he wasn't just wasting the network's time with the squirrel videos; he was wasting my time, too. I stopped considering myself one of the people "inside the joke," laughing at NBC, and started considering myself one of the people being punked with time-wasting exercises.
It also occurred to me that as long as people like me were tuning in for the squirrel videos, the NBC corporate suits were happy. They didn't care if Letterman was wasting the audience's time. They sold commercial space either way.
So who was actually getting his chain yanked there? The media was getting paid, which is all they care about.
Palin got lots of attention for a speech that turned out to be extremely bullet-point and frankly trivial.
I don't consider this an achievement. I just consider it manipulative, and I don't just laugh it off as playing a prank on the stupid media.
A lot of people traveled a very long way and sat out in the rain for something that was suggested just might be The Big Announcement. A lot of people watched on TV.
And what they saw was a no-brainer stump speech.
Who's being pranked here? The media in attendance were all paid to be there. Their travel arrangements were comped. They'll get back their vacation day. And it was either covering this or covering Jon Huntsman.
What about everyone else?
David Letterman used to make a point of wasting "network time" on dumb stuff. The in-joke was "Can you believe we are doing a network broadcast and yet we're just showing videos of squirrels?" I found that funny, for a time. Until I realized he wasn't just wasting the network's time with the squirrel videos; he was wasting my time, too. I stopped considering myself one of the people "inside the joke," laughing at NBC, and started considering myself one of the people being punked with time-wasting exercises.
At some point, it really does make you wonder whose time is being wasted, doesn't it?
People are people, and politicians are politicians. One you start putting them on different scales or up on pedestals, it's easy to lose perspective and think them angels instead. They're not, though. Just individual humans like the rest of us, doing things, saying things, and fighting for things in their own way. For as deep as Palin must know her support runs, and for as narrow as the polls suggest it is, she's working at a curious angle. If she doesn't make herself clear soon, it could result in a lot of broken hearts.
what a complete joke. this was written by a perrykrishna.
Does Sarah often like to say “full-throated”?
ROFL. and you all still don’t understand why Palin is the only one that can beat Obama. what the others have to spend millions for Palin gets for free. If Perry would have gave this speech noone would know or care. Perry would have had to pass out 5 hour energy drinks just to keep people awake.
sounds like you all have sour grapes....
That woman is doing it again....boohoo
Thanks for the thread, smoothsailing!
I see how excited the Palin supporters are here now, truly believing Sarah Palin is in the race, just not declared yet, so I am hesitant to share this, but I’ll try.
I listened to Sarah Palin’s speech today, but my reaction during her speech must have been quite different than what her supporters were having.
I heard her draw out the five points she felt we needed in a plan to get our country on the right track.
Those five points were:
1. Stop expanding the federal government and devolve powers back local and state government.
2. Repeal ObamaCare.
3. No more runaway debt.
4. Robust and responsible domestic energy production.
5. Eliminate all corporate income tax and corporate welfare — no more loopholes and bailouts.
I have to admit that when I heard her naming each one of those points, I began to think more and more that she was outlining all Rick Perry’s strongest points — that she was going to endorse Rick Perry today during that speech!
I was not EXPECTING her to use today’s speech to endorse Rick Perry - that had not entered my mind at all - that is until she started outlining those points which definitely describe the best of Rick Perry.
As it turned out, she neither endorsed Rick Perry nor did she enter the presidential race.
I know all Palin supporters are going to feel today’s speech was a platform for a Sarah Palin candidacy, but am I alone in seeing how these same five points line up exactly with Rick Perry?
Palin has no chance to beat Obama. The sooner you realize this the better. Her unfavorables are in the dumpster and she’s done absolutely nothing in the past year to show she can lift them out.
NO CHANCE IN HELL. The only thing she is doing is giving Obama and his socialist pals another 4 years to wreck this country. Sarah Palin needs to wake up and get her head out of the clouds.
She’s weak and feeble in the face of a media onslaught. This she has proven time and time again since 2008.
[The speech was bigtime overrated. If it were given by any other candidate, it wouldn’t have registered more than a blip on the radar.]
And I thought it was great. Maybe we listened to different speeches.
man you perry supporters really are living in a dream worls. the only way Palin would enodrse Perry is if he beats her in the primaries. which isn’t going to happen
You must be confused, this is a Palin thread.
Palin just had the largest GOp POTUS campaign event of the season for a single candidate. Perry would have had to pay a lot for that many people to show up. Palin pulled it off by buying a freaking airplane ticket.
Perry stands no chance of winning the nomination the sooner you delusional people get this the quicker we can all get behind the real reformer, Palin, in the race and get Obama out of office and repeal obamacare.
Palin has 0% chance to win a general election. Congratulation on giving Obama 4 more years.
If she doesn’t make herself clear soon, it could result in a lot of broken hearts.
Support for all of these other candidates is very soft and Gov. Palin could, as Huckabee said, “run away with it” when she jumps in. He may well be right.
Obama can't even poll over 50% against Palin. her numbers in polls are a function of other gop voters wanting a different candidate. You think they will vote for Obama instead of Palin? ROFLMAO.
Palin stands about a 90% of being the next President of the USA. The winner of the primary becomes President. If elmer Fudd won the primary he would be president. sadly for you Palin stands a very good chance of winning the primary. The only 100% fully vetted candidate in the race. Agaisnt a flipflopper and a crony capitalist. Yeah she stands no chance. You are delusional.
Look, a N00b Perrysite!
Enjoy your astroturf.
Their bias is pretty obvious. I read this article and was thinking, “What’s your problem?”
Secondly, who said Palin’s speech was going to be the next Gettysburg Address? Do you live in Strawmanville, or Obamaville like the rest of us?
Unlike the “Candidates” we have now, Governor Palin took it to Obama, the Democrats, the RINO’s and the Leftist Media. Did she say everything I would have hoped she should have said, not quite, but she is speaking up for the American people, whether they realize it or not.
No freaking way.
“We have become a nation of dumb down morons.”
Dude, I’m lots of bad things but dumb ain’t none of them.
I don’t know what you are trying to say here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.