Posted on 08/18/2011 8:38:20 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
.. Ping!
A friend of mine often refers to some psychology experiments done years ago in which volunteers were sat in a room with other participants (Unknown to the volunteer, these were all collaborators) and some event would occur, such as a person would walk in and do something or wear something, etc. Then a professor would come in and ask the group individually what they saw, always leaving the volunteer towards the end of the inquiry. The collaborators would say something happened which was very different from what actually happened, and each one in sequence would repeat the same story with individual variation. By the time the professor got to the only actual "volunteer" , most of the time the volunteer would repeat exactly what the other members of the group had said. Only a few people would insist on the truth of what they saw which was in variance with the rest of the group.
My friend always says that were he ever on a jury, he would hang it if necessary, because he will not be swayed by any of the opinions of other jurors in conflict with his own understanding of the evidence.
This I think is the difference between those of us who do not meekly knuckle under and toe the popular line on eligibility, and those on our side who do. A stubborn independent streak is a good thing when justice is on the line.
You again? PJ Foggy give you the marching orders to hit the “birther posts” on Friday?
“As what is past is prologue, I’d like to beat the rush and denounce him now as a traitorous Obot sellout and betrayer of the Constitution rather than wait until after he ultimately explains to the AZ tea party that Birthers are full of it.”
Did you plagiarize that off of BadFiction.com? If not, the DUer/gay-marriage-promoting guy who runs the site is likely to plagiarize it off you. It sounds ***exactly*** like something he wrote, which I read on his site—plus, they do for a fact read FR and repost the anti-birther comments they enjoy most.
I don’t want to be a naysayer, but I’m trying to figure out just what the sheriff is empowered to do here. The WND story says he’s going to “investigate the possibility that a crime has been committed against the Arizona secretary of state, who must decide whether to put Obama’s name on the ballot.”
But what does the secretary of state require to put a candidate’s name on the ballot? Does the candidate have to post a valid birth certificate on the Internet, or even show them one at all? If not, how is the late posting of a forged certificate (assuming for the moment that it is forged) a crime against the secretary of state? It’s just not clear to me what crime could have been committed in the sheriff’s jurisdiction.
Ace's sense of humor is quite good, and somewhat unique. He is clever, witty and very intelligent, as are some of his co-bloggers. He has an amazing range of focus, and maintains an astonishing degree of competence regarding a wide range of issues. I don't know how he does it. *AND* he is FUNNY.
As for the Wasserman-Shultz article, I did not see it. I might have scanned the headline, but since Wasserman-Shultz has recently been in the news for her comments, I haven't paid much attention to her because I don't care what she says or does. (Unless it's big enough to make the headlines.)
Go Sheriff Joe!
Take no prisoners!
The one on the left is Jay Leno.
Saw some posts wondering where the anti-birthers are.
They were ordered to Martha’s Vineyard for kool-aid refreshments.
The only one who missed 0b0z0’s summons is “the deaf one.”
Orly Taitz has cases, right now, in U.S. District Court in Hawaii and in State Court to enforce subpoenas issued in a Federal court case in California. Sept 14th, the officials in Hawaii have to authorize Orly and her team access to Obama’s records or show cause why they shouldn't have to. They have no case. Hawaii law has an exception to their privacy law if the documents are needed in a court case. Also how can they object when Obama has released his BC to the whole world on the Internet?
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
This game is just about over. Obama the fraud is about to be exposed. Birthers about to have the last laugh. Too bad it has taken 3 years. His Martha's Vineyard vacation will be his last as president. I hope he enjoys it.
Oh and by the way, Orly's case is really about Obama’s fraudulent social security number. The birth certificate is a side issue to the case as you need a BC to get an SSN. Using the fraudulent social security number, a felony, will send Obozo to jail. Trust me, this guy is FINISHED. Stick a fork in him, he's done.
The fraud of the century EXPOSED. I can't wait.
Orly Taitz has cases, right now, in U.S. District Court in Hawaii and in State Court to enforce subpoenas issued in a Federal court case in California. Sept 14th, the officials in Hawaii have to authorize Orly and her team access to Obama’s records or show cause why they shouldn't have to. They have no case. Hawaii law has an exception to their privacy law if the documents are needed in a court case. Also how can they object when Obama has released his BC to the whole world on the Internet?
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
This game is just about over. Obama the fraud is about to be exposed. Birthers about to have the last laugh. Too bad it has taken 3 years. His Martha's Vineyard vacation will be his last as president. I hope he enjoys it.
Oh and by the way, Orly's case is really about Obama’s fraudulent social security number. The birth certificate is a side issue to the case as you need a BC to get an SSN. Using the fraudulent social security number, a felony, will send Obozo to jail. Trust me, this guy is FINISHED. Stick a fork in him, he's done.
The fraud of the century EXPOSED. I can't wait.
The ‘deaf one’ should plug his name plus ‘badfiction.com’ into his favorite search engine. His anti-birther comments have been reposted there, which isn’t exactly an honor. The site is run by a Dem who posts on DU and other moonbat strongholds, and who promotes ‘gay marriage’. His whole site is rabidly anti-birther and radically leftist (despite his bizarre claim to be a ‘moderate’. Sorry, moonbat; owning a gun does not make you a moderate).
Funny how many anti-birthers are Dems. Just seems to work out that way.
And I will be correct, again.
And Birthers will segue right on to their next “This time for sure!” moment.
Birthers will behave towards Arpaio exactly how they did towards Judge Carter. And Judge Lamberth. And Justice Thomas. And Dick Cheney. And Justice Roberts. And Donald Trump. Etc...
It will happen here again with Arpaio, and the Birthers will move on to their next promised messiah who shall deliver them from Obama.
The sun will rise tomorrow and Birthers will turn on their latest savior when they get let down.
That's how things have been for over three years. The odds are that's how they will continue.
DNC lawyers would argue that his name really isn't on the ballot and argue for dismissal of any suit to keep him off it, and they would probably prevail.
ML/NJ
Okay, Leno if you like. But HE AIN'T BART SIMPSON!
ML/NJ
(1) What is your definition of a ‘birther’, and (2) how have I behaved toward any of those people. I’m getting just a little tired of the anti-birther memes and generalities. I look at Little Barry and see a fundamentally emotionally disturbed man incapable of telling the truth—particularly, especially and pathologically—when it comes to his childhood. He doesn’t tell lies, he IS a lie. That is the nature of Malignant Narcissism. This is fact, not opinion. Only those with little or no comprehension of this simply devastating personality disorder believe otherwise.
You look at him and see a trustworthy man known for his honesty and integrity? If not, how do you figure out which lie to believe and which to question?
“The ‘deaf one’ should plug his name plus ‘badfiction.com’ into his favorite search engine. His anti-birther comments have been reposted there, which isn’t exactly an honor. “
Got a link?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.