Ron Paul supporter takes out full-page ad that asks: ‘Have you ever had sex with Rick Perry?’

A Ron Paul supporter in Texas has taken out a full-page ad in a local alternative weekly newspaper seeking women who have slept with the presidential candidate.

“Have you ever had sex with Rick Perry?” asks the ad, which runs in this week's Austin Chronicle. The ad was placed by Robert Morrow, who describes himself as a “self-employed investor and political activist” and a three-time delegate to the Texas state Republican convention.

Oh right, the War on Drugs has been so successful.

Has the war against bank robberies been totally successful? I don't think so but I do not want to legalize it.

If you had been the parent of a sixth grade girl when Perry mandated that she be vaccinated with Gardusil, and you had dared to question the safety of the drug, you would have been laughed at by Perry supporters, and told to sit down and shut up.

How do you feel about the surrender monkey demanding that an under aged girl be allowed to cross state lines in order to get an abortion that was illegal in the state she lived. I bet you loved that.

Strange analogy. Bank robbery is illegal by its very nature. Stealing is illegal AND immoral. Using drugs is not by its nature illegal, and whether or not it's immoral is even open to debate. There's no commandment that says "Thou shalt not ingest substances that make you act like an idiot."

Get back to me when you have a better analogy.

How do you feel about the surrender monkey demanding that an under aged girl be allowed to cross state lines in order to get an abortion that was illegal in the state she lived. I bet you loved that.

I have no idea who or what you're referring to. But Ron Paul is as strongly pro-life as any candidate running. The Gardusil mandate had nothing to do with State's Rights. It had to do with a dictatorial executive using his power to override the will of the people.

Stealing is illegal AND immoral.

And getting stoned on drugs isn't?

There's no commandment that says "Thou shalt not ingest substances that make you act like an idiot."

There is a commandment that says "You shall have no other gods before me." Drugs do that, to the user they put nothing before getting them.

I have no idea who or what you're referring to. But Ron Paul is as strongly pro-life as any candidate running.

Anyone who knows anything knows that the surrender monkey DEMANDED that an under aged girl be allowed to cross state lines in order to get an abortion when it was not legal in the state she lived. HE IS NOT AGAINST ABORTION. He is only against it when it fits his position. Just like he only follows the Constitution when it follows his agenda.

And getting stoned on drugs isn't?

Where do you draw the line? Is it immoral to eat beyond satiety? Is it immoral to sit and play video games so long that you get a clot in your leg? These are victimless crimes. Neither the law nor God will punish you for overindulging in an activity that involves no victim other than oneself. To declare that getting stoned is immoral is just arbitrary. Believe it if you like, but you have no right to impose that belief on others.

There is a commandment that says "You shall have no other gods before me." Drugs do that, to the user they put nothing before getting them.

Drug addiction is a physical addiction. Do you realize that there are addicts who never even chose to take the drug in the first place? Wives whose husbands tied them down and injected them with heroin, for example. Personally I would not compare drug addiction to devotion to God.

I'm not going to comment about the abortion case, because you insist on referring to Ron Paul as "surrender monkey." You plainly hate the man, so there's no point even discussing this issue with you.

." You plainly hate the man, so there's no point even discussing this issue with you.

My father served during WWII and Korea, my son served and was almost killed in Iraq, and I served during Viet Nam. I do not like anybody who hates America and blames her for every problem in the world like Ron Paul does.
If he had lived during the Revolutionary War or War of 1812 he would have sided with the British. He would have sided with Hitler during WWII. He would have NEVER retaliated against Japan, (He would have said their attack on Pearl Harbor was our fault like he did with 9/11).
No I do not like any surrender monkey who wants to put his head in the sand and feels if he appeases our enemies enough they will leave us alone. Bullies do not go after the strong, they go after cowards, and cut and run is the king of cowards.

You're wrong. Ron Paul would have been one of the founding fathers of this country. I respect your history of military service, but let me ask you this: If you were military age right now, would you go to Libya or Syria when Obama sends ground troops to overthrow the heads of these sovereign nations? Would you justify your actions by saying you're protecting our country from Al Qaeda, when our forces are fighting on the same side as Al Qaeda in Libya? At what point do you stand up and refuse to take part in wars that are unconstitutional, immoral, strategically nonsensical, and economically devastating? That's what Ron Paul is doing. He is not, to use your favorite silly ad hominem, a "surrender monkey." He would defend our country in a legitimate conflict. For one thing, he would defend our borders:

Ron Paul on borders:
A nation without borders is no nation at all. After decades of misguided policies America has now become a free-for-all.
1.Physically secure our borders and coastlines.
2. Enforce visa rules. Immigration officials must track visa holders and deport anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law. This is especially important when we recall that a number of 9/11 terrorists had expired visas.
3. No amnesty. Estimates suggest that 10 to 20 million people are in our country illegally. That’s a lot of people to reward for breaking our laws.
4. No welfare for illegal aliens. Americans have welcomed immigrants who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules. But taxpayers should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools, roads, and social services.
5. End birthright citizenship. As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be citizens, the incentive to enter the U.S. illegally will remain strong.
6. Pass true immigration reform. The current system is incoherent and unfair. But current reform proposals would allow up to 60 million more immigrants into our country, according to the Heritage Foundation. This is insanity. Legal immigrants from all countries should face the same rules and waiting periods.

What sense does it make to send our young men to defend the borders of countries that have not attacked us, when our own borders are under seige?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.