Posted on 08/15/2011 12:28:44 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
In the Words of Tim Adams; His Master’s Thesis states,
“There is No Birth Certificate for Obama!” “There Isn’t One!” “He’s Lied About Being Born in a Hospital in Hawaii.”
Tim Adams was the Senior Elections Clerk for the city and county of Honolulu during the 2008 presidential election. Tim was the person who told the media that there was no long form birth certificate for Barack Obama in Hawaii, and that it was common knowledge by all of the officials there. In his position, he had a staff of about fifty people who were in charge of verifying voter eligibility. He stated in his thesis that he had access to all the usual government databases to verify voter identities. They had access to databases such as NCIS, Social Security, and others. He does not say that he looked up information for Barack Obama, just that the group had access to information.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Link won’t load for me.
You are so correct about malignant narcissism. ANYBODY who’s EVER known one will see through Obama in a Chicago minute.
He would seem to share little in common with Farah, but is willing to use World Net Daily as a source when it suits his purpose.
Adams compares himself to Hunter Thompson ...and then Socrates. He shows moments of interesting insight alternating with political naivete’. About the 2008 election..."The only change that had come to the White House was the color of the skin of its occupant."
Maybe I missed it, but as far as the “missing birth certificate”, he is repeating what he has said before. I didn't notice any new revelations.
Besides, how credible is a man Who says...
“...quote the Rolling Stones, “Meet the new boss/same as the old boss”(“Teenage Wasteland”). “
THE ROLLING STONES?!?!?!
It’s easy to tell who’s been around a Malignant Narcissist, and/or studied the disorder, isn’t it? All anybody has to be is familiar with it, and you can spot it in Obama from a mile away.
Yet there are people who believe anything he says. There are even some who believe all or any part of Dreams. Obama himself admitted it’s not factual. It’s fully of ‘composites’ and other crap meant to protect him from the charge that he misrepresented the facts.
All of which makes sense, because every ‘fact’ in the book that can be tested against known facts has turned out to be fundamentally misrepresented. Which leaves only the parts of the book that can’t be fact-checked. So some people will acknowledge problems with the checkable parts, yet explain them away as no big deal while accepting as fact everything that can’t be checked. Yet ‘birthers’ are supposed to be the crazy ones?
It’s as if you have two stacks of bills from the same source. One stack you’re allowed to test but the other is off limits. Every bill from the first stack turns out, upon testing, to be counterfeit. So you make the assumption, based on that, that every bill in the second stack is NOT counterfeit.
But again, it’s the ‘birthers’ who are nuts.
Placemark!
Thanks for the posting!! This is very important!!
I suggest people send this to their Congressman & Senators
I did ......I copied /pasted the complete article after my comment below:
This young man was a Senior Election Clerk with a staff of 50 for the City & County of Honolulu during the 2008 Presidential election...
He states that there is “No Birth Certificate” for Obama!!
He has been threatened, his accounts have been hacked into, he has been followed by police, they tried to discredit him... He received the Chicago “Thuggery” Treatment for speaking the “Truth”!!
This information deserves to be addressed by Congress!!!!!
Tony Rezko is a convicted felon –
prosecuted by and found guilty in a federal court.
Who then has overseen the potential and repeatedly delayed sentencing of Mr. Rezko for the past two years?
Who has ultimate authority to broker a deal and request and obtain those delays?
Who is the one all federal prosecutors are required to answer to?
*********************************************
Who can effectively cease a federal investigation that might potentially do harm to President Obama?
****************************************
None other than now-embattled Obama Attorney General Eric Holder.
Great pic with the comment!
Thank you, Phil!
Keep up the good work!
I’ve noticed that when using Google to search for “birther” info, the hits that come up are often mostly worthless and tend to lead the less seasoned researcher astray. I’ve come to the conclusion that whomever is responsible fine-tuning the Google search engine is/are deliberately manipulating the processes so that the results are less helpful. I’ve been using Dogpile instead with much, much better results. Google is not to be trusted on this subject.
If Issa sticks with his investigation regarding Operation Fast and Furious, Holder (at LEAST) is toast. Who will protect Zero then?
On the probable bias of Google search results, see the guest list at a private dinner Obama attended in in San Francisco in February of this year:
“The list of guests — made public Thursday morning — is set to include Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, according to the White House. Google co-founder and CEO Eric Schmidt and Cisco Systems CEO John Chambers will also be attending the meeting with the President.”
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/from_rock_star_to_rock_bottom.html
Several states have tried. So far, IIRC, they all get cold feet at the last moment...
There is little doubt in my mind that most of the research cited by the Obama defenders on this website, originates on Fogbow or Obamaconspiracy.
I have argued this issue on many websites, and the only places I encounter such detailed and in-depth researched rebuttals are on Obamaconspiracy and Here. (I don't bother with Fogbow, or Obamaconspiracy anymore for that matter.)
It is axiomatic to me that the only people who feel strongly enough about this issue to go through the dull and boring trudge work of finding passages in ancient documents to support their position are Dedicated Liberal Democrat Obots, and those members of the Republican establishment that share common cause with them. (Which is what I suspect we are dealing with here.)
Post of the day, and it’s not even 10 a.m. here. Thank you for putting into words what I have thought but have never expressed so well. There is something positively creepy about the depths and lengths and breadths to which Obots will go to defend the marxist. No conservative would take that much time to prop up this fraud and pathological liar, ditto Independents and moderates. Ninety-nine percent of Dems either don’t care or else blindly buy whatever Obama is selling.
That leaves a tiny sliver of Obamaphiles who have devoted countless hours to marshaling obscure, Byzantine, legalistic, light-weight, mind-numbingly repetitious ‘arguments’ to bolster The Won’s fraud-riddled birth narrative. They think we can’t figure them out. They think we are ignorant rubes. Perhaps there is just a little projection involved in their thought processes.
The scary thought is the righteousnous of their convictions, regardless of the trampling over of all our rights just to preserve their idol.
Thanks for the Dogpile promo...
“The scary thought is the righteousnous of their convictions”
Yes indeed. They should form their own exclusive little club and call it, ‘Condescension R Us’. Or similar. I’ve never been so talked down to as by the ‘I believe Obama’ crowd. Whew. Maybe pretending to be the smartest people in the room is all they’ve got. Though if my claim to brilliance was believing everything the Pathological Liar in Chief says about his birth narrative...I wouldn’t publicize it.
Good analogy. Unfortunately, I’ve encountered more than my fair share of MN’s in the world of business. Probably anybody who’s held a job in a large, competitive corporation knows the type. Obama could be a poster boy for the condition.
Back during the campaign, quite a few bloggers recognized the syndrome. No conscience. Complete self-love. Frightening to have such a person with so much power.
When he is opposed, or worse, looks like he’s losing? Rage beyond anything normal people can imagine.
Some say that his minions are planning a new radical project beginning in May: Days of Rage for the 21st century. I can see that coming, too.
Nailed it! You are truly a person who knows what he’s talking about. There is no rage like Narcissist Rage. Now that Obama sees his popularity sinking, you just know he’s seething. Dangerous is an understatement. If he thinks he’s going to lose in ‘12, he will machinate heretofore unimaginable chaos and convulsions. At least a lot of us are praying. May this great country survive the next fourteen odd mos, plus Obama’s transition, and heal apace afterward, amen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.