|
Posted on 07/05/2011 7:39:19 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Frankly, I find it very unlikely HI requires a certified/bonded/registered process server. I’m not familiar with various states’ laws; however, but this was issued by a federal court.
As far as I know, the server only has to be at least 18 y/o and not be a party or subject to benefit from the litigation. I don’t know about rules on service by mail.
This is the link for Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 45 (subpoena) an an extract on service, which confirms my suspicion about WHO can serve.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule45.htm
(b) Service.
(1) By Whom; Tendering Fees; Serving a Copy of Certain Subpoenas.
Any person who is at least 18 years old and not a party may serve a subpoena. Serving a subpoena requires delivering a copy to the named person and, if the subpoena requires that person’s attendance, tendering the fees for 1 day’s attendance and the mileage allowed by law. Fees and mileage need not be tendered when the subpoena issues on behalf of the United States or any of its officers or agencies. If the subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things or the inspection of premises before trial, then before it is served, a notice must be served on each party.
|
Hey Commie FogBlowers, I know some of you guys are reading this thread. Check out posts 81 and 83.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2744423/posts?page=81#81
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2744423/posts?page=83#83
The clerk must issue a subpoena, signed but otherwise in blank, to a party who requests it. That party must complete it before service.I assume a "party" is someone involved in the lawsuit--which in this case would be Orly. So she can get a blank, signed subpoena and fill it out herself just for asking. Do either of you (or anyone present) know at what point that becomes enforceable? Whatever the merits of this one, she obviously wouldn't be able to subpoena any document from anyone she likes--or would she? Does it really have to wait until the recipient declines to respond, and then the judge decides whether they have to?
Look for a strange and unexpected fire some place in Hawaii.
I think the “III” in the name will give HI the excuse not to comply, or to respond there are no records on BO III.
If it is not quashed; yes.
If this paper copy doesn’t match the scanned copy that they posted recently, they still have some ‘splainin’ to do.
I don’t think they are going to try to forge anything. They obviously do not have someone qualified to do the job. No I think they are trying to figure out a way to cover their own behinds. They, all involved at the DoH past and present, are looking at jail time.
BTW, is it a crime to add more ink to our Federal Reserve Notes? Banks seem to do it all the time.
Would a jury ever convict for that form of civil-disobedience? Or would it force more discovery?
So then, what might be the most catchy short phrase to ink or stamp on our notes to draw wide-spread attention to this issue?
Like...
Obama’s LFBC is a fraud - Investigate!
O’s 2011 LFBC is a forgery!
Unless this version 14.7 shows a US citizen daddy, he still isn’t eligible.
FUBO
For BO the third? How many coinky-dinks and mistakes and oopsies and my bads and misspokens and faux pas and outright lies are we supposed to give him?
Thanks for the link. I had read about his analysis before, but had not seen the document he attested to.
Why can’t this woman get it right.
I often wonder if she is working for the other side.
How in the hell could she put in Barack Obama III
The usurper is going to regret getting him the governorship even if he's the only person on the face of the earth who can claim with a straight face to have ever seen his parents Ann, Sr. and little Barry's doppelganger together in Hawaii.
Because the GOP had McLame pimping for the usurper. They knew the housing and economy was going belly up so they did everything they could to play hot potato with the election. They knew neither side had an eligible candidate and the GOP would have bowed out at the last minute if McRINO could have come up with more votes. They also orchestrated many of the bs Palin scandals and pulled her off the campaign when her popularity unexpectedly surged - couldn’t have that. This is also why they’ve done absolutely nothing to slap down the current fiasco. If they were to lift one finger to stop this runaway train, their duplicitiy would be shouted from the top of the NYT’s building. They made a pact with the devil and whatever comes of it they can’t hit the reset button.
Narcissists usually end up tripping over their egos.
My theory on the obvious forgeries is that they're smart enough to know that whatever the problem on the bc is that if they were to "fix" it and someone uncovered the fix then that's the box the eyes' of the world will zero in on. However, if they were to mess with a couple dozen or so boxes on the bc then no one would know what the target of the fix might be. So many fixes help with distractions in that everyone played for weeks on pixels and layers and such all the while forgetting about the main target.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
