To: John Semmens
> In her ruling, Judge Karen Schreier called the
> restrictions “unacceptably cruel and inhumane.
Yes, and we all know that burning babies alive in saline solutions, pulling them apart while they are still alive, and decapitating them while their legs are still in the birth canal are kind and humane acts.
2 posted on
07/03/2011 12:21:07 PM PDT by
Westbrook
(Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: John Semmens
snip---"what has been a settled federal policy for nearly four decades."
Why didn't they just say so? After all what the government does is perfectly moral and just.
Why is the left "always" at the heart of taking away rights and jackbooting the innocent? (slavery, abortion, ect...)
3 posted on
07/03/2011 12:26:35 PM PDT by
pennyfarmer
(Even a RINO will chew its foot off when caught in a trap.)
To: John Semmens
I hope they plan to appeal this legislation from the bench!
6 posted on
07/03/2011 12:44:25 PM PDT by
Paperdoll
(NO MORE BUSHS!)
To: John Semmens
OK, ya got me at first...
7 posted on
07/03/2011 12:47:10 PM PDT by
piytar
(The Obama Depression. Say it early, say it often. Why? Because it's TRUE.)
To: John Semmens
The Feds are requiring graphic photos on tobaco products -— but don’t tell the truth about abortion!
11 posted on
07/03/2011 12:54:19 PM PDT by
eccentric
(a.k.a. baldwidow)
To: John Semmens
a waiting period and making you hear the other side first is not a restriction on abortion.
15 posted on
07/03/2011 1:21:53 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson