[Westbrook]

> In her ruling, Judge Karen Schreier called the
> restrictions “unacceptably cruel and inhumane.

Yes, and we all know that burning babies alive in saline solutions, pulling them apart while they are still alive, and decapitating them while their legs are still in the birth canal are kind and humane acts.

[tbpiper]

Who would have thought that a Clinton appointee would be in favor of murdering the innocent for convenience and profit?

[He Rides A White Horse]

In her ruling, Judge Karen Schreier called the restrictions “unacceptably cruel and inhumane.

Every time I repeat the statement, the more insane it sounds.

“The Roe vs. Wade decision of 1973 established that it is a woman’s inalienable right to terminate a pregnancy at any time and for any reason,” Schreier declared.“

The Bill of Rights are clearly explained in the Constitution. That includes the Second of course. I can make a guess with confidence where see comes down on the issue.

Roe vs. Wade was conjured up from a judge legislating from the bench. The judicial branch is worrisome since the are usurping the other two branches of government.

Adding fuel to the fire we have a president who has judges in his pocket. The legislative branch (which should directly represent the people) is treated as a mere inconvenience.

Picture of judge. She looks, uhh, like she would be really good at softball.