Posted on 07/02/2011 8:15:05 PM PDT by jacknhoo
Why would he do that? This is the question many people asked of the rape accusation leveled against Dominique Strauss-Kahn; recently humiliated and removed head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The biggest reason for asking the question was a total lack of logic behind raping a hotel maid while being such a public figure in charge of such a public institution and at the same time under consideration for a nomination to be president of France! It simply did not add up.
Kahn, known for his public fancy for women, was widely considered a womanizer by many published reports. He even said in an interview that his political enemies would probably use this as a way of attacking him prior to the French elections.
Today, July 1, it was revealed that the maid who accused him had actually lied about the event in question and Kahn will be released on his own recognizance. The setup has some deep and powerful roots, as you will see.
Kahn was replaced by Christine Lagarde. Lagarde, who is currently under investigation for ethics violations herself, has in her resume' a history of working for Chicago based law firm Baker & Mckenzie. Try to keep up now!
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
The latest NYPost article conjectures that she was accustomed to trading sex for money, that she went to his room expecting that, and only cried foul when he refused to pay. Yes, there’s DNA evidence, but it only proves a sex act took place. You can’t prove rape (unconsented sex act) by DNA alone. You have to rely on testimony. And this testimonier is not terrible credible one way or another.
....and Jack Ryan, Oabama’s opponent for the 2004 Illinois State Senate race. Jack withdrew after his Divorce records were unexpectedly leaked to the media
Most in the legal profession are vile leftists. That’s one of the reasons we’re in the handbasket heading south.
Other articles state she was a prostitute. Looks as though the “rape” may very well have been a business deal later claimed to be rape.
Her job as a maid is what gave her access to her higher paying clients.
It’s surprising to me that high class hotels that cater to the rich and famous don’t do a better job of background checking every single employee. Unless prostitution is on her list of job duties.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2743385/posts
Dominique Strauss-Kahn ‘refused to pay’ hooker maid for sex
NY Post ^ | 7/3/11 | BRAD HAMILTON and CATHY BURKE
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2743402/posts
Maid ‘laid’ low as DA paid for digs (kept working as a hooker even under DA supervision)
NY Post ^ | 07/03/11 | BRAD HAMILTON and LARRY CELONA
Good Lord! She looks like a 7’ tall Oompa-Loompa!
Just the way this was handled makes me think that someone is trying to pressure this man into submitting to someone else’s ideas.
Sure he had sex with the maid. Most women know what it takes to seduce the majority of men on this planet. She made sure there was going to be a DNA sample.
This guy isn’t the violent type. A single officer, wearing a suit could have gone up to him while he was in the lounge at the airport and quietly arrested him. No fuss, no cameras, bring him downtown, question and book him.
Instead, uniformed officers were used to remove him from the plane and parade him through the airport in handcuffs. The media was certainly given prior notice of the arrest and the charges.
All this could have been avoided if he had just gone along with someone’s plan about some country’s financial difficulties. Next time the punitive consequences will be a car crash and his wife or daughter will pay the price of his insubordinate behavior.
Elementary school class grown old? What a silly picture.
“... it was revealed that the maid who accused him had actually lied about the event in question..”
I think that is factually inaccurate. It was revealed she had lied, but not necessarily about the incident. If it were determined that she’d lied about the incident itself, the sexual assault charges would have been dropped. Not to say she didn’t lie about it, but it wasn’t absolutely ascertained or revealed, so the charges stand, at least until they can prove one way or the other she also lied about that.
Her ‘revealed’ lies seem more related to her immigration papers, her associations (boyfriend incarcerated) and possible drug dealings. That makes for a rather unreliable witness for the prosecution. Of course, a person can lie about 50 things and be truthful with one, but their credibility would have to be weighed. Even if she’s telling the truth on this, I don’t see how the prosecution can proceed with that type of witness in the face of ‘he said/she said.’
I’m not surprised. Obama and his Chicago thugs are so corrupt that I’d be surprised if they weren’t somehow involved. They’ll do anything to get what they want. The rule of law is a weapon in their hands.
Sometimes it sure seems that way (except for the right wing extremist groups, of course).
But you have to know by now how communists operate, particularly in matters of sex (a la Clinton, Weiner, Kennedy, etc.)
This is far from a nice man we're talking about...a man who wants power. Never believe such a one.
Presence of sperm is not, per se, proof of rape.
Believe it or not, despite what the FemiNazis claim, consensual sex does occur.
Really, it can. And it does.
Management of high end resorts and hotels know what their customers want and anticipate said wants.
Sex on demand is one such thing.
Oh, you mean like the Chambers of Commerce?
SMELLS LIKE A POTUS RAT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.