Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transformers: Dark of the Moon: Movie Review
Neoavatara ^ | June 29, 2011 | Neoavatara

Posted on 06/29/2011 6:54:11 AM PDT by Neoavatara

Transformers: Dark of the Moon, the third in the Transformers series, is in some ways the perfect summer movie. A movie where you can turn off your brain, ignore reality, and simply enjoy sugar sweet Hollywood mayhem.

The movie starts with a basic concept: that the space race in the Cold War was focused on reaching the moon first, not for its scientific achievement, but to obtain alien technology that both the Soviets and Americans secretly knew had crashed on the dark side of the moon millenia ago. Americans, led by Neil Armstrong, get there first...but keep the information hidden.

(Excerpt) Read more at neoavatara.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: 3d; blogpimp; hollywood; moviereview; movies; pimpmyblog; transformers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-335 next last
To: Mad Dawgg
You are grasping at straws now.

So do you or do you not support posters excerpting their own work (after repeated requests to post in full) for the purpose of getting blog hits by using FR as a free advertising platform and FReepers as a free hit farm? Hmm? Can you actually answer this question?

If you support pimps then you are in favor of something Jim Rob has said he does not like.

141 posted on 06/30/2011 1:01:02 PM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg; Eaker
I've shown the post to several local friends ... we are all still chuckling

From this we may deduce:

1. You have an i-phone
2. You are in a gay bar

142 posted on 06/30/2011 1:01:02 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg; DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

“Notice both the Mods AND the Robinsons have been pinged to this thread yet it remains open. Are you “catching on” yet?”

What I notice is that somebody called Mommy, and Mommy didn’t come.

Catch that?


143 posted on 06/30/2011 1:02:15 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

LOL


144 posted on 06/30/2011 1:03:04 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
Well then let us see where you stand. Do you wish a blogpimp to post in full his blog here when in fact it could be a reprint of copyrighted material from elsewhere? Thus violating someone else's copyright and opening up Free Republic to a law suit?
145 posted on 06/30/2011 1:04:06 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

Who knew they called it “chuckling” these days?


146 posted on 06/30/2011 1:05:11 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

Pardon me for attempting to defuse what has become a needlessly heated discussion with a little humor. (In before someone says, “Yeah, very little.)

But it was far from a non-rebuttal. You accused me of the apparently egregious sin of erroneous conflation. I disagreed. I am not conflating the two things. As long as the mods don’t choose to pull a thread or kick the offender off the board, I would assume that there must be some sort of sliding scale relating to blog posting, promoting, pimping. Some would draw the line one place and others would draw it somewhere else.

There was a time when people could simply disagree. These days a disagreement seems to require that someone get thrown off the lifeboat.


147 posted on 06/30/2011 1:06:56 PM PDT by newheart (When does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

“Well then let us see where you stand. “

At this point I couldn’t care less.

I’m just having fun pouring gasoline on your fire.


148 posted on 06/30/2011 1:07:32 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

How is it you’ve been around Free Republic all this time and haven’t yet read about Mr. Robinson’s opinion of blog pimps? It’s quoted and linked to in so many blog pimp threads that it’s certainly no secret.


149 posted on 06/30/2011 1:07:50 PM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

I don’t care who you are. That’s funny.


150 posted on 06/30/2011 1:08:56 PM PDT by newheart (When does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: newheart

For what it’s worth (admittedly not much), I would “Like” your post if this were FB


151 posted on 06/30/2011 1:09:26 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
"So do you or do you not support posters excerpting their own work..."

Yes, especially if that is what they wish to do. Further if The Mods or the Owners want to delete such then I applaud that as well.

What I don't want to happen is Free Republic to get sued because someone posted a copyrighted work against the author's wishes.

Now IF you believe dumbergunner's assertion that most Blog pimps post reprinted material doesn't logic tell us ALL blogs should b excerpted to stop some libtard idiot from opening up Free Republic to more copyright litigation?

152 posted on 06/30/2011 1:12:18 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
"How is it you’ve been around Free Republic all this time and haven’t yet read about Mr. Robinson’s opinion of blog pimps?"

Where did you get that idea.

If you notice this thread is still open. Thus it tells me his excerpting his blog is Kosher.

153 posted on 06/30/2011 1:17:26 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
You are completely insane. I replied to this post:



To: TheOldLady

Are you pretending to confuse the two? It is abundantly clear that Jim Robinson’s polite request is that bloggers who have their own material to contribute to Free Republic post it in full.

It may be Mr Robsinson's request (yet he makes it not a rule) but I wasn't addressing Mr. Robinson I was Addressing Blog Pimp Policeman dumbergunner. Who routinely claims that Blog Pimps should post their work in full and refuses to click the link then states most Blog Pimps use second hand material.

You do see the problem with such an argument don't you?

132 posted on Thursday, June 30, 2011 3:42:19 PM by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies | Report Abuse]



If that was not addressed to me, please explain to whom is it addressed, if you can. And here is my reply:



To: Mad Dawgg; humblegunner

So... You expect me to make my own arguments and humblegunner's arguments as well? He has no need for me to defend his position, for he is more than capable of doing that himself. If you don't understand the plain English that we are speaking and need some help understanding the simple, one-sentence concept that we are attempting to explain to you, I suggest an ESL course forthwith.

I see you are still dancing around with the smoke machine and the fancy MylarTM mirrors. But you don't fool me for a second. I've met your kind before.

136 posted on Thursday, June 30, 2011 3:53:54 PM by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies | Report Abuse]



And you replied with this post:



To: TheOldLady

"So... You expect me to make my own arguments and humblegunner's arguments as well? He has no need for me to defend his position, for he is more than capable of doing that himself."

Ahhh you replied to a post not directed at you so weren't you doing exactly that?

Let me guess if I look in Webster's Dictionary next to the word Clueless I would see a digital representation of yourself?

Seriously your post is an attempt at self-ridicule by sarcasm... right?

140 posted on Thursday, June 30, 2011 4:00:34 PM by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies | Report Abuse]



You make no sense at all. None. You're all smoke and mirrors,which you would not need if your behavior were in any way condign.

154 posted on 06/30/2011 1:20:49 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
most Blog pimps post reprinted material

When they post about news stories, where do you think they get the info dumbass?

They read it somewhere. They see a video. They see a news show.

These flatulent and fraudulent blogwankers have no research staff.

And there is not one damned thing that prevents them from posting
their full content of warmed-over crap right here for all to see.

No reason exists for them to excerpt other than to scam traffic away from Free Republic.

Supporting that action makes you an enemy of Free Republic.

155 posted on 06/30/2011 1:21:17 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
So you support blogpimping (despite JR's words on the subject) and yet applaud pimp threads being deleted. You don't seem altogether consistent...
156 posted on 06/30/2011 1:23:51 PM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
"No reason exists for them to excerpt other than to scam traffic away from Free Republic."

I see so then you wish them to post such in full? Even though you acknowledge they don't have a legal copyright?

157 posted on 06/30/2011 1:23:58 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
"You don't seem altogether consistent..."

I would gather such seems so to you because complex thought is out of your reach.

158 posted on 06/30/2011 1:26:15 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

You obviously didn’t read JR’s words. Blogpiping is NOT proper


159 posted on 06/30/2011 1:26:39 PM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
"You don't seem altogether consistent..."

Oh so if such is so why aren't supposed Blog Pimp Threads deleted?

160 posted on 06/30/2011 1:29:06 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-335 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson