Posted on 06/26/2011 4:16:28 AM PDT by techno
Proof?
In Japan and Europe, 'the ole backstabber' Romney
is NOT EVEN ON THE SCREEN.
For Palin to beat Obama, she has to transform her image and the misconception that she is an idiot. This takes time. It will require a long period of strong interview and debate performances.
“finally among Roman Catholics the Democrats only got 44%’
Why did Obama get ANY RC votes in the first place?
The swing voters in swing states are the ones who decide the election and a successful GOP candidate will have to appeal to them, not just the base.
This election will be about the economy and jobs, “it’s the economy, stupid” will be the determining factor again.
Acorn wont be stealing some states with new voter ID laws.
Not THIS time.
Make your case.
Last time I heard PA ballyhooed that McCain had a real shot there. He ended up losing by 10 points.
Remember the Murtha election before he died. He was supposed to be in real trouble. He won.
Fool me once shame on you; fool me twice shame on me!
Too bad, Team Romney THREW Election 2008 to Obama.
No doubt TEAM Romney will make up to Obama
for any loses due to an absent ACORN.
Team Romney works against America and the GOP on the sly.
Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan.
Cheers!
I do see two additional states which could go to Palin in your scenario, NM and IA.
I think NM is highly dependent on the Hispanic vote and the role Susana Martinez has to play in the 2012 general campaign.
Imho, it would take Hispanics staying home in droves for Palin to win NM. But it is possible.
As for Iowa, didn’t I read it has become more Leftist in tone recently because of an influx on new citizens to the state?
Please stop this nonsense. I’m a huge Palin fan but she is not running in 2012.
does not Palin need to decide to run for this analysis to have any meaning?
There are 75 reasons that I previously posted at FR to why I believe Sarah Palin is running.
Showing up at the premiere of the Undefeated in Pella, Iowa on Tuesday could be considered #76.
Iowa has seen a surge in Republican voter registration and I believe has a large number of Independents. I'm guessing a Tea Party backed candidate would do very well there.
Unlike most of the rest of the Republican field she does not need to announce her run untill the last minute. Sara Palin has basically 100% name ID among primary voters already, and many of her fans will gladly send her money, even if she announces in November.
Why should she announce any sooner than necessary to get on the ballot, since given past experience, the moment she announces, the left will try to destroy her via lawfare.
After a dozen phone calls a week from the RNC, I finally answered it and told the caller the “Republicans don’t “get-it” and to quit calling”.
Next time the RNC calls, tell them you’re sending your contributions directly to the conservative candidate.
You have that thought correct;
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.