I'm pretty sure what I said was a second class of citizen, but let me check....
Yep, I did.
You should read the syllabus.
Nah, you wade around in the Cliff Notes. I'll be reading the actual opinion.
as a class of citizens
Fine, ya don't want to believe the English there, what's the only other time the word "class" appears in MvH?
The appellant’s brief in Hollister v Soetoro used Minor v Happersett as referencd precedent. That appeal was presented to the US Supreme Court Justices for Certiorari conferences on two occasions but the Petition was denied both times.
See page 35 of the Appellants’ brief:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22846775/HOLLISTER-v-SOETORO-JOINT-APPELLANT-BRIEF-1216986-Transport-Room
Both Kerchner v Obama and Hollister v Soetoro have made the “two citizen parents are required” argument to the Supreme Court but the Roberts court does not appear to be interested. Neither appeal has made the “Discuss” list at the Supreme Court which means automatic denials.
It only takes the interest of one Justice to put an appeal on the Discuss list and it takes the concurrence of four Justices to grant a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari.
You're splitting fine hairs. There are no "second class of citizen" in the United States. The existence of the Constitutional natural born citizen clause does not make other who are not NBC second class.
Fine, ya don't want to believe the English there, what's the only other time the word "class" appears in MvH?
Spin all you like but you're full of nonsense.