Posted on 06/20/2011 11:49:29 AM PDT by Chunga85
Copy your dockets frequently People!
This is a case that had one copy of the ............ahem..........alleged endorsed "original note" filed in a foreclosure lawsuit, and then a completely different endorsed copy of the ..............ahem.............alleged "original note" filed in a subsequent case (after the first case was dismissed). Featured Here.
(Excerpt) Read more at foreclosurehamlet.org ...
The banking swindlers have lost, forged, backdated, created, altered, documents beyond count. (And many more dastardly deeds)
Now get this...documents are vanishing (and being replaced with new and improved versions) from our hallowed court houses! Gasp!
It's a blog, so if you don't like blogs don't click it.
Are the forged documents being thrown out or accepted by the courts?
On a blog. Only.
I've got news for you folks.
They do not care what we think.
Laws? We don't need no stinkin' laws!
How many mortgages in the U.S. over the past 15 years were in MERS? What portion of them are missing records to convey clear title to property after foreclosure?
Chaos? You bet. Pain? Suffering? Ruination? Oh, sure.
But we owe something like $120T dollars and the paper that says we owe it is written in crayon. At some point people are just going to fold their arms and say "I'm not playing that game any more. So, what are you going to do to me and my 50 million friends?"
A week after I make my final payment!
I'd call it a crime, aided and abetted by someone in the clerk's office. I'm guessing that the "deadbeat" looking for a "free house" card will be played and that will be quite sufficient since most people don't have a clue about any of this.
One of the biggest problems is an utter lack of transparency.
In the case of MBS, generally the foreclosing entity objects to document production of the PSA and other agreements because they claim the borrower is not a party and not in privity. However, the OCC lists on their blog that the borrower as an essenntial party in the securitization process.[1]
Color me cynical but I have a suspicion that multiple payoffs were made on a single default transaction with the knowledge that the Goldman thugs now in "Government" would dump it all on the taxpayers (minus their vig of course).
Enter CDS. The buyers of the risk had a vested interest in default. Hence the outcome based appraisal, and the disregard for underwriting standards applied at origination.
The more likely the obligation is to default the more profitable it may turn out to be - a very perverted and unhealthy example of the "free market" at work.
[1] Comptroller of the Currency Asset Securitization November 1997
"Got a pen? Just sign here and you're good to go!"
I also have a suspicion this has occured even when there is no default. And for that reason goes unchecked.
Obamacare will become single payer "health" care, and we'll all become wards of the state.
Demand your Satisfaction of Mortgage document!
You know what’s really scary?
Some homeowners (like me) don’t have a clue what this is or what this means.
I’ve been reading reports where the banksters lawyers have taken to demanding the return of all evidence/documents immediately after a decision has been made ,,, this prevents the homeowner from examining the docs (which subsequently go “lost”) when they file an appeal.
It means you can be foreclosed on, even if you’re completely current on your payments, because nobody knows who you actually owe the money to.
It is complex for the purpose of complexity. You will never understand it because it makes no sense.
If you were to allot the significant time it takes to look at it in a very granular fashion - it makes even less sense.
Unless, of course, you roll with the "Too Big Too Fail" crowd.
From that perspective it makes perfect sense - to people who have been consumed by greed.
I'm glad that I will never understand any of this. I just know something is very wrong.
No kidding. The Big Money Boys are going to keep using us like slot machines until we are used up and tossed out.
the only problem is that they’ve exhausted the bank accounts of the lower 79%, and now will have to start feeding on themselves.
The only way to stop this is to elect a Congress that will actually penalize these gangsters and rapists and take away their ill-gotten gains. But how do we do that? If higher taxes on the wealthiest are anathema to everyone in the Tea Party and the Republican Party, how do we ever get some of this stolen lucre back, sigh of convicting them and forfeiting their estates to the Crown? We don’t have a Crown - yet. At least not a named one.
there will never be a jubilee. We will be stuck in poorhouses, working to pay off our debts, long before.
Just wait until they start throwing debtors in jail. They’ll be more of us than there are marijuana busts! They won’t even be build enough prisons fast enough. More likely, they will be work camps, similar to the ones in China. We’ll work to pay off fradulently-foreclosed mortgages on buildings we don’t live in anymore, back taxes we didn’t really owe, student loans debts ... you name it.
A host of the newly-elected GOP governors are actually developing plans to hire out prisoners as inexpensive labor, so that they can bill them for room and board.. Any profit that the state makes from hiring out prison labor is used to balance the state books.
Think it can’t happen here? It already is, brother.
tampering with court files is a felony.
It will get a lawyer disbarred.
I have not heard that. Do you have any references?
Spoiliation of evidence will result in you pleadings being stricken and a judgment entered against the spoiling party.
It’s been on some of the foreclosurefraud blogsites ... I didn’t save the url’s but with the courts accepting almost anything from the banks they probably don’t see it as “spoilation” ,, rather they’d call it “safekeeping”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.