Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

See that’s the problem with you canon worshippers. you rudely insult everybody that likes their Trek fun. And you studiously ignore the fact that there’s actually quite a bit of not action sequence in JJ’s movie.

I’m not “mistaking” you for anything. By your own words you’re a canon guy. You’ve said it outright. I don’t care which version of Trek is your favorite, as soon as you start complaining about canon, as soon as you start declaring something “not Trek” just because it doesn’t follow some exact and silly formula you declare yourself a canon guy who frankly was part of the problem on what ruined Trek.

Every time you say it’s not Trek you tell us tons of unflattering things about yourself. It WAS Trek and it complimented REAL Trek fans. The only people it gave a finger to was the same crowd Shatner gave the finger to in the infamous SNL sketch. And Shatner was right. And JJ was right. And you are wrong. It was Trek, it was REAL Trek that exists as a SHOW not a religion.


61 posted on 06/12/2011 10:08:13 AM PDT by discostu (Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

Sorry, Stu, it sucked. It was like South Park’s Stan Marsh watching the previews for comedy movies... total $hit. And you’re the one getting hot under the collar over this stuff because I disagree with your take. Again, just because you think canon is something for Abrams to take a dump on to make it “fun” doesn’t mean the rest of us do.


63 posted on 06/12/2011 10:24:07 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson