Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

Sorry, Stu, it sucked. It was like South Park’s Stan Marsh watching the previews for comedy movies... total $hit. And you’re the one getting hot under the collar over this stuff because I disagree with your take. Again, just because you think canon is something for Abrams to take a dump on to make it “fun” doesn’t mean the rest of us do.


63 posted on 06/12/2011 10:24:07 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

I’m not hot under the collar, I look at canon worshippers with pity. you’re the one talking about canon being raped, and dumped on and declaring things aren’t Trek like you’re Gene freaking Roddenberry. you’re the one hot under the collar. I’m the one calmly agreeing with the 94% rating the movie has on Rotten Tomatoes. My side represents more of the “rest of us” than yours. We can tell because the last movie that appealed to the canon crowd grossed 67 million, and Abram’s Trek (REAL) hauled in 385 million. The canon people are the odd men out, and that God for that. You guys had your shot, you killed the franchise, now it’s back to being REAL canonless Trek.


64 posted on 06/12/2011 10:31:13 AM PDT by discostu (Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson