Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nazi Legislation for a "Judenrein" (Jewfree) California: Banning Judaism
Atlas Shrugs ^ | 6/3/11 | Pamela Geller

Posted on 06/03/2011 4:29:29 PM PDT by Nachum

Last week I posted on a clearly antisemitic piece of legislation in San Francisco and Santa Monica banning the Jewish religious tradition of circumcision. Judenrein in Sunny Southern California: Banning Male Circumcision.

America, this is getting very, very ugly. Male circumcision is significantly healthier with or without the important religious significance. The Islamic practice of female genital mutilation (cutting off the clitoris) is sick misogyny. To equate the two is officially legislating Jew-hatred.

Any doubt this was motivated by hatred and racism?

Zombie over at PJM: Proof that S.F.’s circumcision ban is anti-Semitic

As you may have heard by now, San Francisco will be voting this November on whether or not to ban circumcision in the city.

Defenders of the measure say it’s all about “human rights” and “protecting babies” from unnecessary procedures.

But critics suspected there was something vaguely anti-Semitic about the whole proposal, since among Jews (and Muslims, as well) circumcising male babies is a religious duty, not just a mistaken medical procedure.

Ban proponents insisted their proposal had nothing to do with Jews — really, it’s all about the rights of children.

Well, any doubt that they were lying have now been dispelled, with the publication of new campaign literature for the upcoming circumcision ban. The campaign comic book, called Foreskin Man, after its baby-saving superhero, features a litany of evil Jews doing battle with blonde Nordic saviors.

Yes, really.

(Oh, and did I mention the artist’s last name is Hess? A relative of Rudolph, perhaps?)

Below you will find a selection of images taken from Foreskin Man, the campaign brochure for San Francisco’s anti-circumcision ballot measure. You tell me: anti-Semitic or not?

(Excerpt) Read more at atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: 1938; antisemite; calegislation; california; circumcision; foreskinman; germany; hadrianandantinoos; holocaust; islam; jewfree; jews; judenrein; legislation; nazi; obama; palin; sanfrancisco; sanfranswishco; santamonica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Tax-chick
Incidentally, Democrat court jester, Jon Stewart, did this youtube on the healthy penis mascot and the syphilis sore mascot; however, he doesn't mention that the campaign was really marketed toward homosexuals in San Francisco. And the healthy penis mascot could not be used in San Francisco again because it is circumcised.
21 posted on 06/03/2011 6:18:20 PM PDT by Stepan12 (Palin & Bolton in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

To be fair, the ban is anti-Muslim too, so maybe it’s a wash.

/sarc


22 posted on 06/03/2011 6:19:28 PM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

What? You are being sarcastic, right? I have nothing against blondes. My mom is a blonde.


23 posted on 06/03/2011 6:47:34 PM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Disgusting. And anyone who claims it is not anti-Semitic is either stupid or a liar. Or both.

BTW, one can buy Foreskinman on Amazon or Google.


24 posted on 06/03/2011 6:54:14 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Socialism works great until capitalism hits a rough spot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
propaganda comic book with blond heros

Not really (me being sarcastic), Hollywood has been using blond hair to represent evil for at least 30 years. Blond hair and a square jaw is often a dead giveaway for who the bad guy is, or will turn out to be in the end.

25 posted on 06/03/2011 7:08:56 PM PDT by ansel12 ( JIM DEMINT "I believe [Palins] done more for the Republican Party than anyone since Ronald Reagan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar; Interesting Times
The true face of Democrats that its “Jewish” members ignore.

Yes, I am amazed that so many Jews continue to vote for Democrats.

I'm willing to bet this legislation will exempt Muslims.

26 posted on 06/03/2011 7:31:02 PM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Jeepers. Thanks for the ping!


27 posted on 06/03/2011 8:06:47 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12

Yes, I do recall reading about that here on FR. It’s on the thin line between “funniest thing ever” and “nuke them from orbit.”


28 posted on 06/04/2011 3:26:48 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Oh most loving Father, preserve us from faithless fears and worldly anxieties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Yes, I do recall reading about that here on FR. It’s on the thin line between “funniest thing ever” and “nuke them from orbit.”

I have to say that I do not find Jon Stewart very funny. I find him pompous and a Leftist propagandist rather than funny.

While this video is funnier than his usual fare,
(a) it doesn't point out that this healthy penis campaign was really marketed with homosexuals in mind and,
(b) utilizes somewhat the cheap humor of the movie "Porky's" which plays upon a person's psychological tendency to nervously giggle when talking about sex and sexual organs in such an explicit manner.

At least, that is my cynical take on the matter.

29 posted on 06/04/2011 5:01:13 AM PDT by Stepan12 (Palin & Bolton in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12

I meant that the campaign itself was funny, in a “can’t believe this is for real” way, not Jon Stewart. I am not amused by him at all. He is a pure tool of the Marxists, authorized by the Party to occasionally mock some of their own who are egregiously worthy of ridicule (Anthony Weiner) as a cover for his attacks on the nation.


30 posted on 06/04/2011 5:08:04 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Oh most loving Father, preserve us from faithless fears and worldly anxieties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
One objection to circumcision on newborns is the fatality rate associated with the operation. Wait as little as six months to a year and the fatality rate goes to zero.

With Leviticus saying in the eighth day, changing to a longer period would require a Rabbinical judgment. Rabbinical because Leviticus predates the sect of Christians.

Which is more important, saving one in one hundred thousand or eight days?

31 posted on 06/04/2011 9:25:03 AM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Islam is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Really? I haven’t payed much attention to that...but then I almost never watch hollywood stuff anyway...


32 posted on 06/04/2011 12:46:01 PM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

San Franciscans are OBSESSED with Weiner.


33 posted on 06/04/2011 12:49:16 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

One of my big interests is in watching the manipulation in Hollywood product.


34 posted on 06/04/2011 12:54:05 PM PDT by ansel12 ( JIM DEMINT "I believe [Palins] done more for the Republican Party than anyone since Ronald Reagan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is as disgusting as anything I have ever seen.

Pure evil. Hitleresque.

And please remember, people, that the pleasures of sex are more important than life itself for these foreskin fans: every single one of these people who want to ban foreskin removal have NO PROBLEM with the Full Child Removal two months earlier (abortion).


35 posted on 06/04/2011 12:56:37 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

I didn't think I'd live to see this filth in my own country.

Our mohel is a lovely man, a retired pediatric urologist. He's a wonderful family man, an art collector, a Grandpa. It makes me sick and brings tears to my eyes to see him characterized this way.

36 posted on 06/04/2011 12:59:01 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: W. W. SMITH
One objection to circumcision on newborns is the fatality rate associated with the operation.

Baloney. For a healthy 8 day old infant, the fatality rate is close to zero. The problem is with some Jews who INSIST that it has to be the 8th day, even when the baby boy was born with problems, or premature. This is FAKE piousness, as all rabbinical authority insists that the bris be done on the 8th day OR when the child is healthy enough to receive it. We are to LIVE by our commandments, never DIE by them. Starving to death in the woods, we can kill and eat a wild boar. But some Orthodox Jews take this too far -- skipping important life-preserving medication on Yom Kippur even when their Rebbe permits it, and insisting that a boy born 2 months early gets his bris on the 8th day after his premature birth... This is FAKE PIOUSNESS.

37 posted on 06/04/2011 1:07:04 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Is that not what I said. The fatality rate is not zero when circumcision is performed on a newborn.

Waiting a short period of time would see the fatality rate go to zero.

Which would God prefer. perform the circumcision at eight days and have one baby out of one hundred thousand die or wait say eight months and not have any babies die.

What does it say in the Bible about saving one child's life?

38 posted on 06/04/2011 1:48:29 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Islam is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Pinging you to another Judenrein thread. BTTT.


39 posted on 06/04/2011 1:53:36 PM PDT by PA Engineer (SP/AW12: Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
[Starving to death in the woods, we can kill and eat a wild boar.}

That reminds me of a story my father told me forty years ago. He worked for the Federal Bureau of Prisons. One inmate, a Rabbi, that worked for him came back from dinner one day with the comment that the ham was very good that day. My father commented “I thought you where Jewish”? He responded with “oh it's OK I blessed the ham before I ate it.

40 posted on 06/04/2011 2:00:41 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Islam is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson