[wtc911]

I don't care about Palin one way or the other. I am convinced that she is neither qualified nor electable and I believe that she could not beat obama.

I do not want another four years and I think that a Palin candidacy will give us that.

I base this on an un-impassioned study of her record. If you notice, I do not throw bombs or call names. I post facts from her actual record and quotes from her own words. If you call that pissing in the soup then get used to the taste.

As long as this is a forum for conservative thought and opinion then I will continue to post the facts of her record.

If you don't like it then don't bother to read my posts.

[JPG]

Yeah? NK was a slip of the tongue, which she instantly corrected and yet you offered it up as evidence of incompetence. IMO, you are a phony.

[death2tyrants]

I post facts from her actual record and quotes from her own words.

You're a total fraud. You're always trolling the Palin threads. You post 'quotes' and then intentionally misinterpret the quotes in an effort to trash her. Post 120 is a perfect example of this.

[Gargantua]

"I am convinced that she is neither qualified nor electable and I believe that she could not beat obama. I base this on an un-impassioned study of her record.

Ahhh. You base these assumptions on your careful studying of "her record."

That being the factual case, surely you can tell us what you found in studying "her record" that shows she is:

1) Unqualified.

2) Unelectable.

3) Unable to beat Obama.

I sincerely appreciate your logical and verifiable approach to this. Sway the vote to your camp. Explain those three little points up above, which we believe when you tell us you arrived at by reviewing "her record."

What in "her record" proved to you she is "unqualified?"

What in "her record" proved to you she is "unqelectable?"

What in "her record" proved to you she "cannot beat Obama?"

We're waiting.

;-\