“That’s the question you keep ducking.
You said that MD’s appointment renders him unfit but you won’t admit that your standard (note - it is the standard you set - not I) renders SP unfit.
Why do you find it so difficult to be consistent?”
The question you asked regarding Palin had nothing to do with Daniel’s competence regarding HIS horrific appointment. Citing someone else who you say made a similar error isn’t a justification of Daniels appointment of a Judge to the Court who clearly has no regard for the US Constitution. You haven’t addressed that. Defend the Daniels move, if you dare, instead of changing the subject to something else. If you want to defend Daniels, tell us why he did what he did. Your smarmy conflation of Palin (who clearly frightens you) is the equivalent of one of your kids doing something wrong, and then justifying their action from any culpability by saying to their parent that they should just chill because their friend did the same thing. Your conflation is as transparently vapid as the guilty child’s justification. Lame.
This thread is about the Indiana Supreme Court’s unconstitutional ruling, which has nothing to do with Palin. The ruling is directly related to whether Daniels is competent. And again, even using your lame conflation, if you think it’s a wash between Palin and Daniels, you still have yet to say how that qualifies him to the presidency if your intimating it disqualifies her.
Before there was a commission this sort of partisan politics surrounding the Governor didn't exist ~ they used to elect the judges.
One of the more intriguing things about Daniels is he says he prefers this system to the elective system. I can only suppose he imagines it belches up better judges at lower cost.
Now he finds out what the cost is to the governor for appointing a dud. The best way to remove court cases from the Governor's political burden is to go back to electing them.
You set the standard, not I. You made this type of appointment a disqualifier, not I.