You set the standard, not I. You made this type of appointment a disqualifier, not I.
“iow...Even though you state that an apparantly liberal judge appointment cancels Daniels for POTUS you don’t have the balls to state that a decidely liberal jidge appointed by Palin does the same.
You set the standard, not I. You made this type of appointment a disqualifier, not I.”
The original misguided conflation was yours - you brought Palin up as a comparison in a discussion where she wasn’t mentioned. Since you brought her up, you bear the responsibility for why you did, not me. I don’t have the responsibility to answer your polemic about her because it isn’t a direct response about HIS action. Your attempt to conflate the two was really an attempt to smokescreen him. and smear her - all of which is far too easy to see through. Daniels is unfit, period. Ergo, it’s you who were gutless. Your smear at her was a lame attempt to defend him. Instead of you defending him on the merits - you included her as a sideshow. A typical tactic of The Left when their chosen ones are in trouble (and make no mistake - The Left WANTS to have Obama run against RINOS like Daniels, Romney or Pawlenty).
You still have not said whether or not Daniels is fit for the presidency. In English. He isn’t. let’s hear you defend HIM instead of create diversions. Point blank to you: are you a Daniels supporter, or not?