Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Obama Triplets
Lame Cherry ^ | May 7, 2011 | agtG 248

Posted on 05/07/2011 11:22:05 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike

Yes it will surprise folks and children of this blog that there really is three Obama's running around out there..........the Obama triplets who if Shep Smith was not such a venomous serpent biting for Obama would have seen the story in this and been awarded a Pulitzer Prize........now all Shep will be in a jilted Obama lover looking like the fool he is from the prism of history.......like the flat worlders executing the people who knew the world was round.

Coming around to Barry Soetoro Obama or Barry Obama Soetoro or whatever this Britisher's name is, that we explore something which proves Obama's birth abstract is a fraudulent filing.

Jerome Corsi has been dogging the story about two little girls, twin born right after Obama jr. entered this world from the womb of some mother and herein lies the lies or lays the lies or is the lie of the fraud of the grinning skunk eating chit, Barack Hussein Obama. Mr. Corsi though is playing cute in this as he always does..........as I like the ugly, here goes with exposing Obama as the Birther charges continue.

Barry Dunham received a later number than the Nordyke twins, even though he was born a day earlier at around 7 pm on the Friday, August 4th and the Nordyke twins were born in the early hours of August 5th a Saturday. Added to this, the Nordykes were recorded offically on August 11th, which is three days later than the August 8th signed date on the Obama abstract.

Yet once again Obama is recorded with a later or higher number than the Nordyke's were given.

Note, Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961. Note, Obama was given certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, Aug. 8, 1961.

In unraveling the Obama story, we point to absolutes now in either Ukelele or whatever the guitar named register in Hawaii alone or with the mysterious dead doctor were in the business of producing pre signed COLB's. It is the register who stamps the COLB's with dates and numbers, so this Ukelele is the key in this as the culprit who either forged the good doctors name or had on hand a number of pre signed birth documents which...ok I will cut the bull and just state this is just like what is going on in California, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Texas in registers with doctors are fabricating documentation for bribes from illegals.

I have asked where the money for Obama's private school came from and the question is now was a bribe paid to Hawaiian officials and democratic doctors for the expressed purpose of making illegals legals for Hawaiian funding from the federal government?

The scenario would be as follows in the guitar recorder would get in the Nordyke twins as Americans and register them on the 11th of August. Sometime, much later than August 11th, Madelyn Dunham made overtures for the COLB of her grandson Barry Obama...........who yes, could have been born from her, been born in a pineapple patch, been born in Canada, been born in Kenya as his African Gram has gone on record stating......and Ukelele noting the birth date, the weekend necessary gap in time, recorded as they did all foreign nationals as Americans, but this time screwed up in they could not change the registration numbers as they would have had to redo the entire system. This would mean wasting forged birth abstracts which were pre signed, or in reality, it would have been more work than a clerk wanted to expend, as who in the hell cared about some mongrel kid with British parents as he would never amount to anything but being a dope smoker who vacationed in Pakistan.

So Barry Soetoro Obama was simply catalogued as a recorded birth out of sequence exposing the fraud his abstract is, as it was manufactured at a date later than it was signed than August 8th, and had to be at least August 12th...........proving the guitar player was taking bribes registering foreign children as Americans........and at least was forging the doctor's name or the doctor had pre dated certificates. I would point to that velvety pen all names are signed under all looking almost like the same hand was scribbling them.

The question still remains about that felt pen being decades out of place.

I have real birth record costs for a baby born in August of 1961, and I will bet Obama dollars there are absolutely no insurance nor medical bills he can produce to back up his Hawaiian status.

The hospital stay was 5 days. Circumcision was six dollar. Lab work twenty dollars. Medicines were seven dollars and seventy five cents. The total came to $155.12.

I have the insurance claims, payments ect.... so let the dead doctor produce with this hospital the original payments and that would be something to back up this out of sequence Obama abstract.

All this exposes in Obama releasing this abstract is he is British by birth and the register filed his earlier birth later by number, but earlier by date than the Nordyke twins.

As stated if Shep Smith could quit frothing out of every orifice for his Obama, he would realize like all these other fools that where there is a blazing inferno there is Obama fraud in all of this.

nuff said.

agtG 248 Posted by Lame Cherry at 1:41 AM


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; fraud; hawaii; hawaiifraud; illegals; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Hotlanta Mike
In China calligraphy is an art form. In other cultures it's an artistic way to represent writing ~ plus, there are people who fancy themselves fans of calligraphy who use it elsewhere.

I take it you have no pride in the way you do your signature?

41 posted on 05/08/2011 8:41:59 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike
Damn. Even as a Grammar Nazi, this is too much for me.

I feel like a diabetic that's been dumped into a pool of sugar.

42 posted on 05/08/2011 8:48:06 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

I like this one ....”where there is a blazing inferno there is Obama fraud in all of this.”


43 posted on 05/08/2011 8:49:03 AM PDT by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike
Speedball pens have been used for decades ~ a century even ~ for purposes other than calligraphy ~ which is why I suggested folks look things up ~ remember, we have a claim that certain writing must have been done with felt tip pen ~ at a time before felt tip pens were around (not just uncommon).

Yet, is that true ~ were there other pens that could create marks before 1961 that looked like felt tip pen marks in 1975 and the dawning of cheap fineline felt tip pens.

Remember, we are not advancing the idea that these signatures were done with modern (Speedball) calligraphic pens, but that the marks and style folks think they see were not then, or before, exclusive to the realm of felt tip pens.

Now, about your wife's calligraphy, is it worth hanging on the wall?

44 posted on 05/08/2011 8:49:21 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike
Oh, one more thing ~ if your wife is familiar with Chinese quick script methods of writing (wherein the characters standardized for the character language are reduced to something like Greg Shorthand) have her take a good look at the LEE signature.

I've advanced my notion of how it might translate, and using "Yellow Bridge" (which allows you to copy characters and such and get English and Chinese translations) it's at least a quick notation for something that might mean "Hawaii" in that creole they speak out there.

45 posted on 05/08/2011 8:53:56 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

If other COLBs turn up with out-of-sequence numbers in regards to their dates, you would have a case for paper processing being the culprit. Otherwise this is only one instance, and you have no case for your theory based on one (Obama’s) out-of-sequence number.


46 posted on 05/08/2011 3:26:32 PM PDT by 22cal (Forgiven, not perfected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike; butterdezillion

Ping.


47 posted on 05/08/2011 4:14:28 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

Janice Okubo said that the “date filed” is the date that the state registrar assigned a number to the BC.

Obama’s was supposedly given a number on the 8th and the Nordykes’ were given numbers on the 11th. Piles sitting around or what order things were stacked would not explain this discrepancy.


48 posted on 05/08/2011 8:21:01 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

WHY DO YOU PERSIST IN CLAIMING THIS? I HAVE ALREADY EXPLAINED THIS TO YOU IN ANOTHER THREAD TODAY - AND IT WASN’T WHEN YOU WERE GETTING YOUR “BEAUTY REST”.

You are obfuscating, pure and simple. Cease and desist.

What I said before I will say again, just in case you’re really SLOW and not deliberately acting obtuse. The 151 is the code for births. That number was pre-printed on all the birth certificates. For late birth certificate forms it was pre-printed with L151 (for “late”).

The middle set of numbers was what the HDOH Administrative Rules call the “volume number”; it is the year. Before Y2k it was 2 digits (for example 61); since 2000 it is 4 digits (for example 1961).

The SERIAL number that is specific to the individual named on the BC is the 6-digit number.

The complete file number is all 3 portions put together. But the only part that is specific to the individual is the 6-digit serial number that ends the whole BC#.

You have been told this twice. If you want to see the specific citations or evidence for what I’ve said, say so and I’ll give you more. But FOR HEAVEN’S SAKE, please stop saying that nobody has addressed this. It makes you look like you’re either deaf, dumb, or a liar.

I’m running out of patience with people who keep re-hashing the same stuff as if they missed it the last dozen times we explained it to them. If you want to disagree, fine. Then we can hash it out. But if you’re going to deny forever that we’ve given you the information, you’re just sandbagging. Knock it off!

This is the second time I’ve had to call you out on this issue just TODAY. Once when you tried telling Jeff he had to give you a citation for the statutes that require a seal for a certified BC even though I had already given you those cites. And now when you claim nobody told you what those parts of the BC# are all about, when I just got done explaining it to you earlier today.

You’re wasting everybody’s time, and considering the pattern of your behavior I’d say it has to be deliberate. Just stop! If you refuse to engage with the information you’re given then you’re just stinking up the place so others have too much crud to wade through if they want to genuinely sort it out.


49 posted on 05/08/2011 8:34:30 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

You just walked off the plank.


50 posted on 05/09/2011 5:03:41 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
The reason is that's TWO DAYS AGO ~ you are crossing swords with your own swaths of anger.

I simply missed your post (when 3 years ago?) where you went into detail on the process.

So, the 151 is PREPRINTED ~ finally picked up on that from one of your earlier posts.

I think I guessed that ~ yet, we had OTHERS claiming it wasn't, or just ignoring it.

There must be 50 different relatively current threads on this particular issue. Not everybody reads all the threads in their entirity. I do just in case there are some nuggets.

What you need to do is BE patient ~ so, you know something ~ doesn't help when you start screaming about it.

51 posted on 05/09/2011 5:07:37 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The posts were directly to you. Yesterday. On both issues. You responded the same way to both: went on different threads later in the day where you thought I might not be, and act as though you hadn’t seen this and as if these questions you have render this whole discrepancy with the BC# undecipherable.

People notice this kind of stuff. This is how people get labeled as trolls. You know in your conscience what you’re doing. I’m not God and don’t even want to apply for the job. I’m just telling you what people see, like a mirror, so you can deal with it.


52 posted on 05/09/2011 5:57:25 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

We’ve been over this before ~ check the times. If you get too cranky on who is answering what with which you’ll just get POd and upset ~ this is not the only topic in which I have an interest. BTW, check this ~ http://denver.cbslocal.com/2011/05/08/4-arrested-after-suspicious-incident-at-dia/ TSA has begun arresting people for taking pictures of security operations/lines in Denver. One does wonder if they will arrest Righthaven’s lawyers who are suing folks (including FR) for running a picture they claim to own which involves activity at a TSA shakedown in Denver. We can hope.


53 posted on 05/09/2011 6:04:59 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson