Posted on 05/04/2011 6:57:47 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
Reading the available literature and viewing a few videos has me back to square one about the sequential numbering on Obama's long Form Bityh Certificate. Questions: was there than one machine that stamped the numbers? Did the number have to be set by hand? Are there any other known examples of nonsequential numbering which would open the door for human error?
I would not put too much concern into the out-of-sequence. Possibly they printed off a supply of blanks that went to several people in the office, who then each worked from his/her own pile. The lowest number could have been at the bottom of someone’s pile. Maybe they printed enough for the estimated usage each day or each few days.
Or, the blank forms get filled out first and sent to a clerk who stamps them after several days worth have piled up randomly in an inbasket.
When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.
orly taitz audio...9th circuit!!!!...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RIqMM6Eg30
Tagline material. Much needed these days as FR turns into a veritable safari of exotic and esoteric animals being described based upon the sound of hooves striking the ground.
VERY good article on that here:
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/final-report-obamas-birth-announcements.html
Good idea! I needed to change mine anyway.
Keep in mind the Nordyke twins had their registrations recorded 3 days after Zero 8/11 vs. 8/8 and had lower numbers, 10637 and 38 vs. 10641 for Zero. Could Corsi have found who the real 10641 was? Or is there another BC for Zero say in Abbotsford BC Canada.
I hope one of them is an arrest document for male prostitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.