Skip to comments.
Poll: 4 in 10 Southerners Still Side With Confederacy
aolnews ^
| Apr 13, 2011 – 7:10 AM
| lauren frayer
Posted on 05/03/2011 9:29:20 AM PDT by OL Hickory
A century and a half after the opening shots of the U.S. Civil War, nearly four in 10 Southerners say they still sympathize with the Confederacy.
(Excerpt) Read more at aolnews.com ...
TOPICS: Education; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2011polls; civil; dixie; north; south; thesouthwasright; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-437 next last
To: OL Hickory
Poll: 4 in 10 Southerners Still Side With ConfederacyVERY troubling. Insanity at 60%, and in the SOUTH. We got trouble.
21
posted on
05/03/2011 9:46:00 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: OL Hickory
nearly four in 10 Southerners say they still sympathize with the ConfederacyThe other 6 are Yankee immigrants.
To: OL Hickory
All we have to do for reinforcement is wstch the Damnysnkees screw up everything they touch! Why should we want a nation where NYC is considered normal and Michael Bloomberg a great leader?
To: rokkitapps
no freedom of the press or speech
That was true of both the Union and Confederacy. And that "vigorous" press notwithstanding, you just have to look at the 1863 draft riots to see how free speech was handled in the North.
24
posted on
05/03/2011 9:51:00 AM PDT
by
Renderofveils
(My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music. - Nabokov)
To: Renderofveils
You are correct about that riot, however, the main point is the north maintained civilian authority in most federal areas, while the south had military rule.
To: Idabilly
Count me in.
Resist the federal behemoth!
26
posted on
05/03/2011 9:56:45 AM PDT
by
SharpRightTurn
(White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
To: OL Hickory
I believe it. My Mother-in-Law still occasionally introduces me as "That Yankee Republican".
I am a dammed Yankee, but I've got enough sense to realize a good thing when I see it. Wouldn't change one thing about the south. I love it here.
27
posted on
05/03/2011 9:59:32 AM PDT
by
wbill
To: OL Hickory
Huffington influence? The source is aol news, and she’s there, and wa lah, we’ve got one more civil rights trouble making.
28
posted on
05/03/2011 9:59:44 AM PDT
by
RitaOK
To: from occupied ga
They say it because the assumption is that anyone who agrees is “wacist” and wants to still have slavery.
In the blue states, its seen as proof of how backward and deliverence stupid Southerners are.
29
posted on
05/03/2011 10:01:24 AM PDT
by
Adder
(Part 1 Accomplished)
To: rokkitapps
THe south if they had gained there freedom would have resemble the US under the AoC. They were fighting against centralized govt. YOu cannot judge the North or the South by what happened during wartime.
To: FightThePower!
If people are free to enter the Union, why are they not free to exit?
All contracts have two or more parties. If the contract doesn't specify, then all the parties have to agree to end it, just like all the parties had to agree to the contract in the first place. Basic law, which is based on basic common sense.
31
posted on
05/03/2011 10:04:23 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(Democratic Underground: The Hogwarts of stupid.)
To: OL Hickory
nearly four in 10 Southerners say they still sympathize with the Confederacy. What percentage of the other six have ever heard of it?
32
posted on
05/03/2011 10:08:02 AM PDT
by
SeeSharp
To: rokkitapps
It was a military dictatorship during the war - no freedom of the press or speech. The north on the other hand, had a vigorous press throughout the war.
LOL! Francis Scott Key's grandson et al journalists jailed without warrant throughout the north notwithstanding.
vigorous press?
To: TruthBeforeAll
BUT... the abomination of slavery had to end.
agreed, but (a) that's not why he waged the war (secession), and (b) was 600,000 dead the proper means to that end? Not so much for the rest of the world where slavery was much more prevalent.
To: OL Hickory
As far as the issue of states rights is concerned, I agree ABSOLUTELY with the Confederacy.
However enslaving a race of people was DEAD wrong and I eagerly await the justification of slavery.
To: Jemian
Me too.
We visited the grave of my ancestor who was killed at Chancellorsville on Sunday.
36
posted on
05/03/2011 10:18:09 AM PDT
by
kalee
(The offences we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
To: rokkitapps
the north maintained civilian authority in most federal areas, while the south had military rule
actually every power lincoln assumed during the war was done so under his military rule. he wasn't executing the laws of the day warring secession, suspending habeus corpus, etc.
To: Cheburashka
“All contracts have two or more parties. If the contract doesn’t specify, then all the parties have to agree to end it, just like all the parties had to agree to the contract in the first place. Basic law, which is based on basic common sense.”
Kind of like the Mafia.
38
posted on
05/03/2011 10:21:08 AM PDT
by
FightThePower!
(Fight the powers that be!)
To: central_va
“Appomattox resolved nothing.”
Except to make Wilmer McLean the only American to have a war start and finish on farms he owned.
To: Le Chien Rouge
“However enslaving a race of people was DEAD wrong and I eagerly await the justification of slavery.”
Are you talking about the USA for 80 years after the Constitution was written?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-437 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson