Well, this time for sure, the finding and killing of Bin Laden really is...
Posted on 05/02/2011 2:14:36 PM PDT by Michael Eden
It had to happen eventually. And it finally has. Osama bin Laden is in hell where he belongs, where seventy-two very un-virginal demons will tear his flesh for all eternity.
And it came the best way: by the trigger fingers of individual heroes, rather than by the faceless push of a button to activate a missile by a Predator drone. It is fitting that bin Laden died at the hands of Americans who got to look him in the eye as they facilitated his journey to the eternally burning trash pit in the sky.
And just to add some icing to the cake, the reports are that they killed Osama bin Laden's oldest son in the attack, too.
Osama bin Laden Killed; ID Confirmed by DNA Testing By DEAN SCHABNER and KAREN TRAVERS May 1, 2011My contratulations and heartfelt appreciation go out to all the intelligence and military professionals who brought about this fitting end.Osama bin Laden, hunted as the mastermind behind the worst-ever terrorist attack on U.S. soil, has been killed, sources told ABC News.
Bin Laden was killed in a ground attack by Joint Special Operations Command forces working with the CIA, not a drone strike, a national security source told ABC News.
According to a national security source, a compound in Pakistan where therror mastermind was believed to be had been monitored for months. When the decision was made to move on it, special operations forces were sent across the border from Afghanistan to launch a ground attack and take the body.
DNA testing confirmed that it was bin Laden, sources told ABC News.
Vice President Biden has reached out to congressional leadership to update them on the news tonight.
"This is a terrific day for America and quite frankly the whole world that cares about winning the war on terror," former Bush chief of staff Andy Card told ABC News. Card said the news is "particularly significant" for the intelligence community.
"They're the ones who kept their nose to the grindstone and worked very hard to allow this day to be realized ... finally," he said.
[The rest of the ABC story is mostly biographical on who bin Laden was and what he did. You may read it here].
As President George Bush put it on October 11, 2001:
"In terms of Mr. bin Laden himself, we'll get him running. We'll smoke him out of his cave and we'll get him eventually."It was just a matter of time.
Anyone who has read one paragraph of my blog knows that I am a fierce critic of President Barack Obama. But he and his administration deserve credit for approving the actions that led to this day of reckoning. Obama also displayed some class in how he first called former President Bush and then cited him in his announcement of bin Laden's killing.
That said, the city where bin Laden was killed - Abbottabad - was a military district headquarters. And the early releases are claiming that the Pakistani government was not informed prior to the raid that got Osama bin Laden. And the fact that bin Laden was staying in a large walled security compound only 100 yards from a Pakistani military facility tells you that bin Laden was almost certainly being protected by at least a faction of the Pakastani military.
Given how badly we need Pakistan and other key Muslim countries to cooperate with us if we are to be able to use anything other than a "Kill them all; let God sort them out" policy, Pakistan's apparent duplicity and its cooperation with al Qaeda is not good news.
The war on terror isn't over. It might even intensify, as the terrorist network al Qaeda looks for vengeance. It' s who they are; it's what they do. Here, for instance, is a story that al Qaeda threatened a "nuclear hellstorm" if America killed or captured bin Laden. Rest assurred, al Qaeda will be determined to do something that will seek to restore their honor and credibility in the Islamic world as a result of this raid.
What will happen as a result of this raid and the killing of bin Laden? Will Pakistan be embarassed into more cooperation with the U.S., or will they be embarassed into LESS cooperation with the U.S.? Did conducting a massively consequential military operation in a foreign country without notifying its leaders make that country a better friend, or a less trustworthy foe? Under the presidency of Barack Obama, U.S.-Pakistani relationships have soured to an all-time low. Did this attack on their country improve those relations? What will happen as a direct result of this attack?
I don't even want to think about what would have happened had a Pakistani military or police unit fired on the U.S. special operations forces.
If liberals are consistent, they will immediately denounce President Obama and demonize him for further antagonizing the Islamic world and for risking an escalation of terrorism.
The problem is that that is total crap. And whether liberals like it or not, we are in a war for the survival of our culture against a culture of hate.
George Bush put it best describing countries and their attitude toward the United States: "You're either with us or against us in the fight against terror." That statement was met with incredible criticism and condemnation from the left. And yet, in what way did Obama's actions today do anything other than reinforce that that was the only attitude we could realistically take?
The left has been proven fundamantally and profoundly wrong in its attitude toward the war on terror. And it should be obvious by now that the only way to be successful is to not just follow George Bush's example, but to actually try to "out-Bush" Bush's example.
And Obama has largely "out-Bushed" Bush in Pakistan. President Bush did not want to cause a deterioration in U.S.-Pakistani relations, because he viewed Pakistani cooperation as key in the war on terror. Obama, in using drone attacks and now direct military action, has been far more agressive in "taking the war" to Pakistan.
Another example of "out-Bushing Bush" would be the Libya attack. George Bush - decried as the "imperial president" for his attack on Iraq - at least had constitutional authorization for that action (i.e,. the Iraq War Resolution). Obama took the "cowboy" route in Libya without bothering to obtain permission from any constitutional authority whatsoever. Except the "world." Obama's actions should serve to amply demonstrate just how hypocritical and utterly vaccuous George W. Bush's liberal critics truly were.
Liberals said that Bush's attack on Iraq was a provocation that would make the war on terror worse. They said that the war on terror was a provocation. They said the surge was a provocation. And we shouldn't be provoking the Muslim world like that.
Let me assure you, what those spec op warriors just did in their raid on that compound in Pakistan was an in-your-face provocation.
What's the long-term effect of this degraded relationship with Pakistan going to be? I have no idea. But any liberal who wants to tell me that "cooperative" liberal policies are working where "confrontational" conservative ones have failed is simply an imbecile. Because what just happened clearly proves the exact opposite. And when you consider the fact that Obama has already pursued Bush's policies on Guantanamo Bay, rendition, domestic eavesdropping, the Patriot Act, military tribunals, indefinite detentions and a host of other polices, George Bush and Dick Cheney stand as men proven correct.
We cannot relent. Because our enemies will not relent. They are determined to murder. It is a virtue for them. It is a religious duty. And the 9/11 attack was a religious act.
If these terrorists want to get in America's face or try to intimidate the American people, America should make sure that its warriors give them a giant shot to the nose that they will never forget in response. Whether we speak softly or loudly, I don't really care; just make sure that we always carry one big giant stick, and demonstrate the willingness to use that big giant stick on anyone who wants to make trouble for us.
And so there is one more thing to say: if President Obama tries to take political advantage of the killing of Osama bin Laden, we should make sure the American people know that Obama is planning to gut the budget of the U.S. military that just killed bin Laden.
Our warriors should smile and give one another hearty high-fives for this victory. And then they need to get right back to work. Because what they do is vital for their country, whether their country has the moral intelligence to understand that or not.
What I most like about this is that it sends a message. Even ten years later, the United States of America will continue to hunt you down and kill you if you kill her citizens. And that is a message that Republican and Democrat alike ought to be able to unite around.
Update: we are now learning that it was a squadron of forty U.S. Navy SEALs from Team 6 who conducted the raid that got bin Laden. God bless you guys.
And now we are even beginning to learn that "enhanced interrogation" may very well have given us the information breakthrough that got us bin Laden.
Demons in hell are probably roasting right alongside him. They don’t get special treatment. Their punishment for what they did is all the worse.
Demons have known they’d be ending up in hell for about a gazillion years.
Osama bin Laden’s going to get there and be awful surprised.
I’m figuring the demons will fare a lot better there than bin Laden.
That said, I was using a figure of speech, rather than attempting to make a profound theological statement about the nature of hell.
Btw, I apologize for not having proofed this before posting it. I corrected it on my blog, but had not done so here.
I used to have an automatic proofreading that appeared in my Wordpress as I typed articles. Since replacing my computer with one that uses MS, it has vanished. And I’ve often forgotten to do what used to be automatic.
Well, this time for sure, the finding and killing of Bin Laden really is...
re_nortex,
I saw a little bit of that presidential media bash they had on C-Span, and was really quite amazed.
In the past, it was basically a roast of the president.
But it didn’t take long to realize that if that was the case, I fell asleep and when I woke up DONALD TRUMP was the president.
The elite media WILL NOT hold Obama responsible for anything.
But rest assured they will IMMEDIATELY give him credit for anything that appears good. And if it turns out to be terrible later, well, they won’t bother to report on that.
I’m happy as it gets that this POS was finally taken out, but equally pssed it was done while a Marxist terror supporting foreigner was in office. I pray to God people do NOT forget that THE very first thing our Kenyan in Command attempted to do as soon as he took office was to close down Gitmo! Above EVERYTHING else, this slimebags first order of biz was to kiss the arses of the minions of Bin-Laden, and when he couldn’t get away with that, had his AG attempt to transform them into US citizens! DO NOT LET THE MEDIA BURY THIS! THE INTERNET IS OUR GREATEST WEAPON AGAINST THESE SPINNING A-CLOWNS
GrandJediMasterYoda,
I don’t mention this suspicion in my article, but it occurred to me about 5 seconds after hearing bin Laden was dead that Obama’s polling numbers are dead, too.
And we’ve known for about two weeks that Obama is in full campaign mode...
What I DID try to do in my article was demonstrate that Obama didn’t get bin Laden by relying on the policies of liberalism, but rather on acting like the Bush he has relentlessly attacked for the last five years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.