Posted on 04/30/2011 9:44:49 AM PDT by patlin
Robert Stanley, weekly correspondent for the Washington Times investigative radio, states that the purported birth certificate released by U.S. President Barack H. Obama on April 27, 2011 is a forensic forgery...Mr. Stanley reported the breaking news regarding the forensic fraud in Mr. Obama's newly released birth certificate on Washington Times investigative radio's America's Morning News while being interviewed by reporters John McCaslin and Amy Holmes, also a commentator for CNN.
LISTEN TO BREAKING NEWS
http://www.unicusmagazine.com/MP3/breaking%20news.mp3
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
“The reporter from the Washington Times didnt bring up the time travel stuff. It was the interviewer who spoke about that.”
However, he did pen the following:
I believe NASA is planning to send humans to Mars on a one-way ticket as an insurance policy for the human races survival in this solar system. Unfortunately, there does not appear to be enough time for this somewhat desperate contingency plan.
-Robert Stanley
Mr. Stanley is a crackpot.
The reporter who runs a website detailing how NASA plans to change the earth's orbit to prevent a massive catastrophe? Perhaps the same reporter who writes about the first alien encounters in Washington DC?
Oh, right, it's just the interviewer who's nuts. Feel free to Google 'Robert M Stanley'.
It is not. It says it is an abstract. If they finally decide if Dr. West or Dr. Sinclair that "delivered" or "examined" him. We then might see if either actually practiced medicine at the mentioned hospital. The HI Dept. of Health has for years been playing Legal Weasel Word Games with us. This is no different. I admit that some of the retoric here is far fetched, but this thing has the BIG LIE written all over it. The pieces simply do not fit. They have had to change their story too many times.
I read (but haven’t personally verified) that some parts DO show chromatic abberation, and some parts DON’T. If so, I don’t think that’s possible using one scanner/copier and one document.
I repeat: Have not verified that myself. Don’t have the right software...
Anne Dunhams birth canal was a very busy place apparently, if all accounts were compounded by addition and erudition.
Uh, huh, yeah!
I believe the Obama document contains scan/photocopy/image elements. I'm unclear how these were combined on the security background; I've very unclear how the book page background was removed and why the security background is less sharp in the document area than other places.
But, I am convinced that the layers by themselves, which this article relies on, do not prove "forensic forgery."
ML/NJ
Not sure who is crazier, Robert Stanley who believes in time travel or Joe Farrah who believes that their are pterodactyls flying over his head.
Just travel forward in time, OK brytlea, I’ll get back to you tomorrow after lunch!
I pretty much agree. I think the tech should be examined for forgery, but I think the content is more likely the issue and more important. It is also somewhat useful to expose Obama's false biography in toto.
Further, we should focus on Zero's presidency as the reason to boot him.
bfl
I see it all the time in my work, friend. I reproduced it and examined it myself. I'm not willing to spend a couple of hours searching the internet to please you. If you wish to provide a document that meets your criteria, I'll be happy to examine it.
You do the searching, or disappear.
Back atcha.
You guys want another theory on obama? I read somewhere that Ann is really obamas sister - that HER father is HIS father. He liked black prostitutes - take it from there.
Hillary started this. We should let her finish it instead of having the conservatives do her dirty work.
I liked the theory that was floated a few weeks ago that Obama’s father was Jimi Hendrix.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.