Posted on 04/29/2011 7:16:21 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
Contrary to recent implications, new evidence reveals that Barack Obama was not born in Kapiolani hospital, as records suggest, but, rather, he was merely examined there by a private practitioner, David Sinclair, in the days following his birth, which triggered the validation of an administratively issued Certificate of Live Birth registration, not a hospital generated birth certificate representing an actual delivery.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
So why doesn't he show us THAT birth certificate? His ghostwriter says he has it. Is it possible that the King is lying to his subjects?
As I was saying the other day, Ann may have popped that booger out in the bathroom of an airplane...
Is Barack’s true birthplace located in British Columbia?
http://www.theprovince.com/health/Peace+Arch+Hospital+maternity+ward+expands/4221327/story.html
This was the closest hospital to residents in Blaine, WA. SAD had an aunt residing in Blaine, WA in the early 60’s?
In Dreams Obama specifically mentioned, when he supposedly found his BC, that it contained his birth weight and other stats.
So why doesn’t he show us THAT birth certificate? His ghostwriter says he has it. Is it possible that the King is lying to his subjects?
Because THAT BC might actually be from BC (British Columbia). See post 43.
I have been looking for that quote online and cannot find it. Do you have a source for that? I would be grateful.
That is supposing that Dr. Sinclair actually did examine him and that the info on this newly released abstract is factual. Which of course has not been proven.
Yep, because he was not born in HI....Just "examined" there. (I assume the examination was not fraudulent)
I had that theory myself back in 08. Even the name of the hospital would be appealing to Stanley.
Did Greg Goss see the actual newspaper or just the microfiche?
Ahaaaa! indeed.
Assuming that the Dr. Sinclair actually did examine some baby. Once part of it is shown to be fraudulent, then everything is on the table to be vetted. If it's part lies, then it's a forgery, and who the heck knows what if any of it is accurate.
I am Greg Goss. The email was to me by my friend who lives in Hawaii. He and his wife examined the microfiche in Hilo.
Laddysforest, or butteredzillion examined the microfiche in Honolulu.
Greg, thank you for your post... I have had too crazy a week however to understand exactly what the email is saying. Is your friend saying that the birth announcements do not appear in the microfiche versions of the paper, or something else?
Ah, thank you. I wonder if the fiche was tampered with at that point, from everything I’ve read on Ladyforest’s blog and butter’s (not everything but as much as I can) it seems pretty clear that the microfiches were tampered with.
This evidence shows that baby Obama was examined at Kapiolani within days after his birth by a physician able to legally attest an original birth record issued, not by the hospital, but by the Hawaiian Department of Health (HDOH). Kapiolani hospital has never issued or confirmed an original record for the birth of Barack Obama within its facility to date.This may give an explanation as to why the Hospital is not promoting the letter from Barack Obama claiming he was born there.The HDOH is able to legally name the hospital in its original "Certificate of Live Birth" Regisration document based on the fact that, if it is the location of the first examination of a newborn child by a physician there, the doctor triggers the birth location in absence of any other birth location information.
Simply put, Obama was not born in Kapi'olani, but he was examined for the first time there.
In the original release of the “announcements” it is noticed that all the “birth” announcement were identical, both in names and order printed in the two “different” newspapers.
So what my friend did was examine the microfiche that contained the “announcement and found that the only time this identical match occurred was on the day the Obama’s announcement was “printed.”
So the only conclusion would be that somehow the microfiche was tampered with and these announcements were made on one and copied to the other one.
Butter and or Lady can give you links to more in-depth research.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.