Posted on 04/27/2011 2:53:10 PM PDT by RobinMasters
This is getting good... Just when they thought the "release" would put the issue to rest. Let us see if the mainstream media continues the coverup... Below reports from Market Ticker, Drudge Report and The Smoking Gun web site...
Via Market Ticker: Oh C'mon #2 - AP Is Involved?
The AP has also released a "different version" of the document the White House released. [White House Version Embedded Below, Note The Gap Between Date Stamp And "Date Stamped"]
Guys, this is too freaking blatant.
Incidentally, the AP's version was flattened before being PDF'd. Too bad they forgot to do that on the *****house, er, Whitehouse copy.
Heh AP - betcha you won't look at this!
Here's the AP's document snippet on the accepted date:
And now let's have the Whitehouse version:
Look closely at the date stamp. They're not aligned at the top. The error is small, but it's there. Also note the saturation problems in the Whitehouse version in the word "Date" and the fill on the "A".
The mystery deepens, but the evidence is even more damning than it was before: This "document" was tampered with.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Ever been to probate? Sometimes ownership will hinge on the legitimacy of a signature. There are people who make a living pursuing every jot and tittle.
LibertyLA, wait, don’t disappear, you can’t just leave us hanging! :)
But seriously. Please consider contacting Orly Taitz. She has been soliciting the opinion of computer and graphics design experts.
True, but it makes you wonder. I get a kick out of the way obama seemed to be annoyed by it. He’s not too smart.
And after-birthers have double standards. We would never put up with this kind of mysteriousness in any Republican politician.
Someone please explain to me how the AP got their copy without a green background. Anyone.... Please..... It is not a copy of the pdf, and it’s not a certified copy from Hawaii. So help me out, thank ya.
Nothing here of interest, other than where AP got their image. Different saturation & cutoffs of same image. It happens when the same image is processed differently. Looks like AP got a “true scan”, and the WH got it processed with higher saturation and black/white cutoff. Still nothing akin to “proof of conspiracy” ... and overlooks the elephant in the living room as mentioned in #8.
Really, the PDF version from the White House has an embossed seal, and the AP version (higher resolution) does not. To me, that is the elephant in the room. I’d love an explanation. Maybe the AP unstamped it. Maybe Hawaii released one stamped and one not. Maybe the optimization process puts an embossed seal on there.
Just a hardworking hole digger trying to find out what reeks with this Certifigate scandal. thanks
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.