Posted on 04/26/2011 12:17:32 PM PDT by DeskCaptain
"As always, all of the latest state polls for early primaries are available on the Primaries page. There are still very few polls being done in New Hampshire. Only two of them have been conducted since Trump's political media appearances began:
4/21 ARG -- Romney 32, Trump 17, Gingrich 8, Giuliani 8
4/03 PPP (D) -- Romney 27, Trump 21, Gingrich 12, Huckabee 12
2/14 WMUR/UNH -- Romney 40, Huckabee 7, Pawlenty 7, Palin 6
Individual polls mean little because the chance of inaccuracy is so high. But if they are all in agreement upon a certain point, it's likely to be true. Here, the conclusion to be drawn is that Romney will start the race in very good shape in New Hampshire...."
(Excerpt) Read more at elephantwatcher.com ...
Well, Massachusetts sneezed and infected New Hampshire and Vermont.
Romney will do the same things the Republicans have been doing for years, just playing the game of kicking the can. Do you really think that if McCain got in office, this country would have been better off? There is not much difference between the established DC Reps and the established DC Dems. Little scraps of doing the right thing will not fix this country.
Romney will do the same things the Republicans have been doing for years, just playing the game of kicking the can. Do you really think that if McCain got in office, this country would have been better off? There is not much difference between the established DC Reps and the established DC Dems. Little scraps of doing the right thing will not fix this country.
The real problem is New Yorkers...
LLS
Oh yeah, forgot about that contagion.
At this point in the 2008 race everybody was talking Mitt up as a frontrunner. We didn’t want him then and we don’t want him now. I predict by February the poll numbers will be radically different.
McCain as POTUS would have killed off the GOP for good.
I agree McCain would have killed the GOP. I think a McCain twin or McCain light, especially considering the dire situation our economy is in, will also kill the GOP and our country, thus my comment about Romney.
No offense to anyone, but I don’t care who caucus/primary voters in Iowa or NH vote for.
Also, I’m sick of NH having the 1st primary. I think some other state should have the first, and if NH threatens to keep moving its primary date up to remain the first, then the other state should keep moving its date up.
This nonsense of NH knocking out conservative candidates has got to stop.
LOL. Rudy Giuliani is actually at 8% in that poll? Is this a joke?
I guess that is one state that will never be accused of being overly gifted with wisdom!
Who at the time of elections was ineligible: Obama was ineligible, McCain was also ineligible, Socialist party candidate had only a green card;
Now Romney is also ineligible. They keep pushing ineligible candidates, now this is a pattern.
The One will pass legislation for fast track 10 weeks path to citizenship, based on special skills: 1)you need to be muslim 2)know muslim language. Now this is a skill set, no requirement for English. Then the next day they will be potential presidential candidates.
This is where are we headed.
Likely true, but that is not the same thing as killing off America as we know it.
All now is questionable and subject to interpretation. All previous presidents have been born within the 50 states or territories that became states. Now we don’t have candidates from the states?
McCain-Federal law says anyone born in the Panama Canal Zone after Feb. 26, 1904, as a child of U.S. citizens is declared to be a U.S. citizen himself or herself. Some have questioned, however, whether this makes McCain a “natural-born citizen,” a term the Constitution doesn’t define any further; the federal law took effect about one year after McCain’s birth, and doesn’t say the person’s citizenship was considered to have been acquired at birth. So the lawyers said this and that and still there is a controversy for all candidates?
Obviously a part of a plan. They will push to change the Constitution.
I'm the furthest thing from a Romney fan but this is a little too much.
I can prove he is eligible. His father ran in 1968 and no one was foolish enough to raise the "but he was born in Mexico" argument. Why not? Becuase George was a citizen via his parents being citizens. Mitt was born in the US to parents who were also US citizens therefor he is eligbile. I'm not for Romney, but he's an NBC.
Northeastern liberals supporting another Northeastern liberal. Nothing unusual there....
Mitt Romney’s father, George Wilcken Romney (July 8, 1907 – July 26, 1995) was born in Colonia Dublán, Galeana, in the Mexican state of Chihuahua – one of the Mormon colonies in Mexico – on July 8, 1907.
“Mr. George Romney of Michigan is ineligible to become the President of United States because he was born in Mexico and is therefore not a natural born citizen as required by United States Constitution.”
If Mitt Romney’s father was born in Mexico, then Mitt is ineligible too.
Again - why they are always searching for controversial candidates? I suppose there are enough candidates born in some of the 50 states to U.S. parents. But no, they will look to find only controversial candidates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.