Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Double Standards (brilliant essay on the religion of peace.)
Gates of Vienna ^ | April 11, 2011 | Claus Thomas Nielsen

Posted on 04/11/2011 8:22:07 PM PDT by Travis McGee

Different strokes for different folks April 8, 2011 Column by Claus Thomas Nielsen

No double standards

“Well, obviously there are different rules for different people,” said the indignant man at the opposite end of the dinner table. A guest at the dinner party had been to Argentina and was telling us about Argentine towns on the pampas where third-generation immigrants were still attempting to uphold a certain level of Danish identity.

The anecdote led to this moralistic statement:

“So there are people and there are people. We are proud that Danes in Argentina are maintaining their own culture, but at home we demand that Muslims assimilate!”

Yes, that’s just terrible, isn’t it? What terrible double standards!

The thing is, however, that this is not a case of double standards. Double standards are about treating what is the same, differently; it isn’t about treating the different, differently.

And of course people are exactly different: Firstly, they can be different by degrees; secondly, they can be good or evil, truthful or mendacious, friendly or hostile, etc.

These differences are real, and naturally we need to treat people differently according to who they are.

Likewise, books that are about freedom and forgiveness must be treated differently than books that are about submission and terror.

Some books deserve a certain measure of reverence, others deserve only contempt. We all know the movie scene where the hero scrunches up the threatening letter and throws it into the fireplace with contempt. Needless to say, this is how we ought to treat threatening books as well.

If Hells Angels move in

I live in a Jutland [Danish mainland — the capital Copenhagen is on the island of Zealand] country parish with 800 inhabitants. This doesn’t sound like much, but nevertheless we have many foreign guests:

We have people living here who come from Germany, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Zealand, Copenhagen, Funen, Britain, Australia and the US.

This is not a problem, and if another 10 ordinary American families suddenly decided to come and live here in our beautiful and exotic region I doubt whether this would cause any problems either.

They would be well received, and on the whole we would think it right and good that they maintained as many of their homeland’s customs as possible.

But what if the new arrivals consisted of ten Hells Angels bikers from Copenhagen, who brought their families to our town and insisted that — in the name of tolerance — they keep not only their eccentric apparel and manner of speech, but all of their peculiar Hells Angels culture with its religious cult of black angels from hell?

What if there were a couple of Hells Angels children in each year group at the local school, and their parents demanded that their customs and their view of women be accorded equal status with the majority view?

In other words: What if they insisted that in future the parish should be bi-cultural, with the Hells Angels culture as one of these two cultures?

Well, within a very short space of time the rest of the inhabitants (including the other new arrivals) would start insisting that the worshippers of hell’s angels either renounce their faith and way of life and be fully assimilated into our parish, or that they immediately leave the parish and settle instead in a place where they would fit in.

Not because we are intolerant and against freedom, but in order to preserve the parish as a place for free and tolerant people.

(To call giving space to a hostile culture “openness” and “freedom of religion” is to use the language to tell a lie, just as the word “multicultural” is nearly always a euphemism for a polarised society.)

In other words, we parishioners would give the adherents of the angel religion a choice. And it is not beyond possibility that, in order to facilitate their choice, we would do as they allegedly did a few years ago in Thyborøn, when Hells Angels chose to culturally enrich this small fishing village via their presence during the summer vacations:

With 3-4 of their shiny Harleys sitting at the bottom of Thyborøn harbour, the rest of the culture-enrichers chose to turn their headlights back towards Copenhagen.

And I don’t think it was the physical act that made them leave. No, it was probably the comical situation that did the trick:

Picture a corpulent, tattooed and leather-clad rider from hell watching, slack-jawed, as his proud mount slowly sinks towards the bottom of Thyborøn harbour, with smiling fish looking on. In a society where people snigger every time they see a biker, their terror would never work.

So does that mean that the good people of Thyborøn are intolerant? No, there is nothing to indicate that, but they do seem to know the difference, by and large, between good and evil, right and wrong.

You see, there really is such a thing as “different strokes for different folks”. There is a difference between people, between cultures, between religions, and between civilizations. Some are good and some are evil. Some are about liberty, about love and equal value and others are about power, hatred and terror.

And it is the latter category that we should keep at bay.

That is why I hope that my own parishioners would act like the doughty fishermen of Thyborøn. There is just one small problem: Our own little harbour is just a couple of meters deep, so it isn’t really suitable for sinking Harleys.

Bonfires

It would be more practical to heap them up and set fire to them together with the black angels’ holy writs and insignia.

In the same way it would have been beneficial to the world if for instance the German and Russian populations of the 1920’s and 30’s had collectively agreed to burn the law books that were symbols of their nations’ enslavement.

And we might have helped them along with a few supportive bonfires of our own.

Of course we should not ban the books; burning them represents simply a symbolic liberation from their contents. And bonfires work. Any oppressive system works only as long as fear reigns. The oppressor has lost his power when the oppressed smile indulgently before they turn their backs.

But what if other Hells Angels followers in Berlin heard of their co-religionists’ humiliation at the hands of our parishioners, and they chose to attack the Danish embassy, kill 38 people and decapitate two female office workers?

Would that make us feel guilty and send us a warning to stop offending the religious sensibilities of Hells Angels followers?

No, on the contrary, this act would show that we did the right thing. They really do need to be fought with all available means. Anyone who previously had any doubts about the intrinsic evil of Hells Angels should now be convinced.

All other decent human beings should now feel compelled to reach for the cigarette lighter themselves.

Fear the fear

Only when we all say: I, too, am a Geert Wilders; I, too, am a Kurt Westergaard; I, too, am a Terry Jones; I, too, am a Lars Vilks [and we might now add: I, too, am an Ann Barnhardt! A-K] — only then will they understand that their terror does not work on us.

When faced with systems that are built on submission, the only thing we have to fear, quite literally, is fear itself. Who, then, are the accomplices to the 70 or so murders that have occurred since the latest Koran-burning by Terry Jones?

General Petraeus is, and so is Obama. When these infantile statesmen refer to the Koran as the “Holy Koran” and condemn the burning of pages made of paper as strongly as they do the decapitation of nurses, then they demonstrate that terror works.

We don’t need fewer bonfires, we need more.

And when it is clear for everyone that we are no longer afraid, then it is not unthinkable that the same fearlessness could start spreading slowly through the oppressed Muslim masses.

You see, each time the violence fails, a little piece of Allah is chipped away, and in the end there will be nothing left of the tyrant. That is why his adherents are so afraid and so angry.

Deep inside they know that Allah is a weakling, whose only weapon is fear. When that fear disappears, Allah and his prophet will disappear as well.

Like dew when touched by the sun.

Claus Thomas Nielsen is the vicar of Stauning.


TOPICS: Government; History; Religion
KEYWORDS: islam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
I simply brilliant essay on Islam I hope you will read and share.
1 posted on 04/11/2011 8:22:11 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eaker; afnamvet; AK2KX; Ancesthntr; An Old Man; APatientMan; ApesForEvolution; aragorn; archy; ...

Please read this and pass it along.

This Danish vicar is exactly right.


2 posted on 04/11/2011 8:23:32 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
"I-Slam" isn't the religion of peace.
It's the religion of PIECE.
The muzzl'ems should take their INFEREIOR religion back to their INFERIOR countries, that God CURSED them with.
3 posted on 04/11/2011 8:26:28 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

BTTT.


4 posted on 04/11/2011 8:28:33 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Actually, it really is what pisses off the muzzies more than anything, that we Americans largely ignore the rest of the world because we can, and they hate that. We have a gift from God in this nation. We have all the natural resources we can use, except for bananas in the winter, and he gave us Brazil for that.


5 posted on 04/11/2011 8:28:38 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

The next few years could tell the tale. Oh, the curse of living in interesting times. I hope we’re still alive on the other side of the coming events. I would surely enjoy seeing the shattering of the glass-jawed prophet of terror.


6 posted on 04/11/2011 8:30:36 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

THX TONS.

Needs printed and spread around widely.

And shoved in some places with several liberal idiots.


7 posted on 04/11/2011 8:33:06 PM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Yes, well said. It is not right to tolerate violence and evil.


8 posted on 04/11/2011 8:44:58 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

BUMP & BLOAT


9 posted on 04/11/2011 9:01:03 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Allowing Islam into America is akin to injecting yourself with AIDS to prove how tolerant you are .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Very good article. Thanks for posting.

Fear is for weak people.

Fislam

Life, liberty and the pursuit and destruction of totalitarians.


10 posted on 04/11/2011 9:39:51 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Thanks for posting.


11 posted on 04/11/2011 9:49:57 PM PDT by kalee (The offences we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

And cartoons. Don’t forget the cartoons.


12 posted on 04/11/2011 10:13:05 PM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Y had an interesting conversation with my flaming LIB daughter (although now that she has a child, her views are SLOWLY changing). I do not use PC terminology; so “Moslems” are Mohammedans and “Islam” is Mohammedism.

Seems that she had never heard anybody use those terms but myself. That’s the way I was taught in the then-Catholic schools. She was incredulous, until the wife spoke up and said that was what she was taught. Mind you, I went to then-Catholic school in NY; wife went to public schools in FL.

Daughter is now a believer; not yet a user. Turn your backs on PC and please use correct English terminology; NOT Arabic.


13 posted on 04/12/2011 3:12:16 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

BTTT


14 posted on 04/12/2011 3:19:30 AM PDT by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Tolerating violence and evil is really just appeasement by cowards who are too cowardly to even admit that’s what is going on.

Such as the NY Times, which had no problem showing Maplethorpe’s “Piss Christ,” but suddenly discovered “religious tolerance” and won’t run the Mohammed cartoons.

I would actually respect them a tiny bit if they just admitted they were terrified of having fatwahs put on their heads.


15 posted on 04/12/2011 5:10:23 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

This is great. I hope Mark Steyn sees this.


16 posted on 04/12/2011 5:34:09 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I would actually respect them a tiny bit if they just admitted they were terrified of having fatwahs put on their heads.

Exactly, there are worse things than being dead.

17 posted on 04/12/2011 5:39:22 AM PDT by Vor Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Will do.


18 posted on 04/12/2011 7:19:41 AM PDT by bayouranger (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Assimilation doesn’t mean completely giving up one’s own culture, which can still be enjoyed in home life, or even community celebrations. However, it does mean respecting the culture of the place to which one has moved, and not demanding that everyone else adapt to YOUR culture.


19 posted on 04/12/2011 8:12:08 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Man, this is GREAT!!! Where did you find it. I love it. This man is MY kinda hero!!!


20 posted on 04/12/2011 8:16:19 AM PDT by dcwusmc (moA FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson