Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE; little jeremiah; LucyT; Natural Born 54
“So, you don’t think there’s any possibility (with no one
that we know of ever seeing her pregnant, with no
marriage license yet discovered, with no evidence
as yet that anyone ever saw them living together)
that she could’ve taken and raised for a time a baby
born to another or been the guardian or caretaker of
said baby ?”

When investigating the investigator must make subjective assessments weighing what is possible vs. what is probable given the preponderance of the evidence.

Is it possible that someone else’s newborn could have been placed in her custody in late August 1961 in Seattle? Yes.

Is it probable? Not remotely probable, given the weight of the evidence that it was her baby, IMO.

First, you have to resort to pure conspiracy theory to come up with a mystery baby scenario. Sure, stranger things have happened. The fact of SADO by herself with a newborn in Seattle is pretty strange, but it requires no conspiracy theory (CT).

Occam's Razor leans strongly against a CT and would only resort to CT as a last resort if there were no other explanation.

But there are numerous, obvious explanations requiring no CT for SADO to be in Seattle with her own baby.

The obvious narrative backed up by the HI transcripts (which can only be rejected relying on CT, IMO) is that SAD got “knocked up” by a foreign exchange student she met enhancing her Commie affiliation in Russian class. The timing is perfect. She drops out of university at the end of the semester per the transcript. The timing is perfect. There is a shotgun wedding per a combination of the HI vital record marriage index and the divorce filing. The timing is perfect. She disappears during her underage scandalous pregnancy (she was 18). The timing is perfect. She reappears after giving birth (location yet to be established to my satisfaction). The timing is perfect.

What kind of CT would it take to come up with a scenario in which a mixed race baby is entrusted in what would be an illegal fraudulent adoption, to an inexperienced, unreliable 18-year-old living alone in a strange city?

Think about it. You have to resort to CT for SADO to have fraudulently present herself in Polk and to the U of WA and subsequently to U of HI as married SADO and to register Barry in school as Barry Obama, her son in her custody presumably with a BC of some kind. Lot's of CT.

Then you have to come up with an alternate father and mother for the baby. I know that some folks are in love with the idea that Barry is the secret love child of Malcolm X and May Angelou born in Africa and spirited into Hawii at age 4 or something like that and then all of the pictures and records for Barry before that and the divorce papers are all fakes or photoshopped.

Massive CT required...all relying on the cooperation to hide the conspiracy of Stanley Ann and her parents and friends and neighbors, HS classmates and on and on.

Occam's Razor says goo-goo-eyed Commie teen Stanley Ann got knocked up by BHO Sr. who most likely turned out to be a barbarian (he was to every other woman) so SADO blew town as soon as she could and didn't return until he had left.

Much cleaner narrative and no CT.

For me the only missing element lacking documentation is SADO’s location the period from the documented Feb 2 HI marriage and the late August sighting in Seattle, give or take the date of birth, depending on what is on the long form when we get to see it. I believe that public opinion will demand release soon.

At the White House press conference today a reporter asked Carney why Obama didn't just file a FOIA request with Hawaii to obtain the long form, as CNN has now informed the nation that Obama has in his power to do, and just get it over.

Unfortunately the reporter “led the witness” by suggesting to Carney before he had a chance to answer that perhaps it was because this might not satisfy birthers and they might just demand more and Carney leaped to embrace that explanation. But it is obvious that there is NO EXCUSE for Obama NOT to file the FIOA and his refusal alone is proof that something that would damage his eligibility is on the BC.

But I digress and it is past my need to put my ME/CFS brain in bed...

1,541 posted on 04/26/2011 10:57:40 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1516 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp
I will read your whole comment tomorrow, just got to this part: Is it possible that someone else’s newborn could have been placed in her custody in late August 1961 in Seattle? Yes.

Is it probable? Not remotely probable, given the weight of the evidence that it was her baby, IMO.

I don't think anyone really has suggested that or thinks that. From everything I've read, I think that she started taking care of Zero when he was around three and he came to HI from where ever he was living before that. I don't think anyone saw Stanley Ann with a baby in Seattle in 1961.

1,542 posted on 04/26/2011 11:09:19 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1541 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp; Danae

Very convoluted, theoretical. Have you read Jack Cashill’s thorough analysis of Ayers and Obama writing styles and journalistic quirks ?

BTW Ask a Hawaiian by birth if she had to file an FOIA
to get her long form .. Danae .. or if she simply indicated who she was with verifiable information, paid the fee,
waited and received it.

I truly don’t know the answer about that.


1,662 posted on 04/27/2011 7:47:56 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1541 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson