Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp
I will read your whole comment tomorrow, just got to this part: Is it possible that someone else’s newborn could have been placed in her custody in late August 1961 in Seattle? Yes.

Is it probable? Not remotely probable, given the weight of the evidence that it was her baby, IMO.

I don't think anyone really has suggested that or thinks that. From everything I've read, I think that she started taking care of Zero when he was around three and he came to HI from where ever he was living before that. I don't think anyone saw Stanley Ann with a baby in Seattle in 1961.

1,542 posted on 04/26/2011 11:09:19 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1541 | View Replies ]


To clarify:

I think some people (or one or two) have claimed they say SA with a baby, but I think they were coached and are lying, or they saw Anna Obama with a baby. I am convinced that Anna Obama and Stanley Ann Dunham are two different people.


1,543 posted on 04/26/2011 11:11:03 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1542 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson