Posted on 04/02/2011 8:54:17 AM PDT by patriotgal1787
. . . . .
Dear readers,
If I've said it once, I've said it a hundred times or more --- how can a guy who does as much reporting on what's going on in the World of Soros miss this? How can a guy who claims to be able to piece disparate pieces together to see the big picture miss this? How can a guy who tells his viewers and listeners to "Question with Boldness" and seek the truth because "The Truth Has No Agenda" deliberately turn his back on what is so glaringly obvious to millions of us? If he can uncover and report day after day on the evil being perpetrated on America by some of the most powerful people in the world, why won't he report on this?
Glenn Beck is anything but stupid. The incredibly talented Beck is nobody's fool. He knows better than most about what is going on behind the curtain, under the surface, in the back rooms. So what gives?
Has he been told to keep his mouth shut? Has he been told his children's lives are in danger if he shines a spotlight on Obama's eligibility? Has he been told he can go anywhere but "there"? Is the truth something so horrible he refrains from telling us because... because... what?
And if Beck's been threatened, what makes this any different from all the other threats he's received that requires him to have 24-hour security protection? What's he been told? Who told him? What does Beck know that we don't?
For a guy who claims to have America's best interests at heart and has dedicated his career to promoting and educating America about the values and history of our Founders and the founding documents, why does he actively disparage those who do "question with boldness" this socialist mystery man in our White House? Who has gotten to Beck?
On this very serious issue, Beck is playing the fool -- the rodeo clown. And never more so than when he makes his weekly appearances as the galoomphy buffoon playing off Bill O'Bloviator's superciliousness. (Lord, that man is an overrated ignoramus.)
When Beck starts with this foolishness, I turn him off. His mockery of those who question with boldness about something he obviously does not want to go near, insults us all. I am personally disappointed in him. And sadly, reluctantly, question his credibility. Every time he opens his mouth to disparage "birthers", he damages himself in the eyes of millions. I shake my head in wonderment. How can he be so stupid? If he honestly doesn't agree that it is a major issue, just shut up about it already. Why insult most of your audience? Or is he trying to signal us that this is such a dangerous area that he is dissuading us from pursuing it? It is baffling.
Note in the video below that Beck and O'Bloviator never address the essential issue Trump has brought forward about Obama's eligibility. Instead they dissect why Trump is making "provocative" statements, deciding it's "because he likes the attention."
O'Bloviator's so ignorant, one wouldn't expect him to think it through any deeper than "announcements were published int he newspaper. But Beck is brighter than that. He's not a stupid man. So who has gotten to him? Who has gotten to Beck???
Pay close attention to what O'Bloviator says at the very end of the segment when he responds to Beck's comment about stating the truth of what's going on: "But then you and I would be off the air."
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-m8W8xc9AoE&feature=player_embedded#at=19]
. . . . .
Even if Obama were born in Hawaii he is not a “natural born citizen”. His father was a British subject and his mother was too young to convey her US citizenship to BHO.
Natural born citizenship requires BOTH parents to be US citizens. Neither of BHO’s parents could convey ORDINARY citizenship to him, let alone the status of “natural born citizen”.
There are no documents showing anyone present at BHO’s birth, other than he & his mother. Neither is the location of his birth documented. (”Hawaii”,”Planet Earth” are a little too vague)
Newspaper birth announcements may be placed by anyone.
In the past Hawaii has, in case of Chiang Kai-Shek, issued a “Certificate of Live Birth” to someone known and proven to have been born elsewhere.
Obama was probably at one time an Indonesian citizen.
Obama probably was enrolled at one or more colleges as a “foreign student”. Thus, he is either guilty of fraud or he is ineligible to be President.
The man who proclaims “transparency” has kept nearly all records of his existence hidden or had them deleted. Something is seriously wrong here.
I grew up in Mormonism but gave it up forty years ago. Back then Christians were the enemy in many ways. The “Only True Church” business really excluded all Christian denominations.
I think Glenn needs to do a bit more investigating unless he has fallen for the latest PR approach by Mormonism. He might think himself as such however the deep deep dogma of Mormonism never claimed that when I was in the church.
JMHO
There’s lot written about it, from Glenn himself. I’m saying that people that are so sure of themselves in their opinions of Beck should take the time to learn.
One think that I laugh about this topic when people say Beck didn’t investigate the church, is that he searched it out trying to disprove it for nearly 7 months. When the missionaries started teaching him, he brought out “Mormon Doctrine”, which he has been reading and researching like he does, full of notes. He didn’t take it lightly, nor does he.
People are free to do their own research, but they should at least do it thoroughly.
Sorry, no way. The Clintons hate the simpleton "community organizer" who popped up and stole Hillary's destiny. Ubama's biggest fear is a primary challenge from The Beast. I am nearly certain that Ubama will change VP horses, with Biden "gracefully deciding" to retire and step away so Hillary can step in. The only question is, will Hillary take that bait? It all comes down to whether she thinks she can campaign and win in 2016 at the age of 69.
She may decide that now is the time to go "all in".
To determine if obama was qualified to serve as President , ask your self one question?
Was both of his parents American citizens at thae time of his birth?
If your answer is NO , then obama is not the President of the United States.
It is the duty of Congress to remove him from office.
The correct method of removing obama from office is to VOID his election.
Everthing that obama was connected with would be voided.
This includes his selection of biden as vice-president.
Some will never grow up. Suspect that some of the posters here are the liberal jackasses.
The answer is definitely no.
So when is this removal supposed to start?
Not happening, is it?
Hmm. So.
On to voting him out then.
BTW you are NOT many, just a very few here!!!
Well...George Soros certainly has your back, Frank. He is trying to get Glenn Beck off the air. Wonder why?
(my posts in the earlier thread)
Beck says:
“If you don’t believe he has a birth certificate, you can say ‘I don’t believe he has a birth certificate.’”
Beck affirms that it is perfectly OK with him for Trump to say that Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate if that is what Trump believes.
Beck’s objection and mockery of Trump was regarding Trump’s sloppy research in suggesting that Obama’s BC might say he was born a Muslim. As all FReepers know who have been following this issue, there is no religion field on the Long Form, which even the London Daily Mail was able to point out IIRC.
Trump undermined his credibility and seriousness on the issue by failing to do his homework or alternatively, it Trump knows there is no religion field on the BC, he was just being provocative to get attention, which is what both Beck and O’Reilly were pointing out as being counterproductive and undermining of the GOP. Do your homework, Trump!
What is most significant to me is that neither Beck nor O’Reilly slammed Trump for stating a belief that Obama did not have a BC, and neither one said “Obama already released it” or “The newspaper announcement prove he was born in HI”.
Again, Beck said “If you don’t believe he has a birth certificate, you can say ‘I don’t believe he has a birth certificate.’” O’Reilly said it was would be good for Trump to get in the race to shake things up.
Since O’Reilly wasn’t referring to the “Muslim” suggestion by Trump, O’Reilly can only be expressing his actual approval of Trump raising questions about Obama’s failure to produce a 1961 BC, IMO.
Look, I grind my teeth every time Beck says “Question with boldness” but fails to point out Obama’s lack of transparency on the BC.
But until last week all of Murdock’s talent was clearly under orders (IMO) to not bring up or discuss the BC other than to affirm the COLB, but they were allowed to play clips of others on other outlets questioning the BC.
All of a sudden, coincident with Trump raising the issue, it is open season on Fox to invite Trump on to declare his skepticism and to invite panel discussions of what Trump said (Geraldo, Greta, and O’Reilly) as well as to agree with Trump (in the case of Hannity!).
Beck has been kicking Obama in the nuts all day every day on other issues (Commies in the WH) so I don’t begrudge
him not going after the BC under temporary orders (now rescinded) from Murdock.
But he is RIGHT. Whatever you may think about the eligibility issue, there is no doubt that Donald Trump is as phony as a $3 bill. He is no dummy. He knows that WE detest the crummy choices for 2012 and are desperate for bold leadership. So he is throwing EVEYTHING out there and seeing what sticks and likely has a pollster he is paying hi-6 figures to check how he stands with prospective primary voters on a daily basis. But we have SERIOUS issus. Abortion. The threat to marriage. Illegal aliens. Does anyone really believe Trump is suddenly "pro-life" because he said so on "The View" a week ago? We need someone with REAL VIEWS, developed over many years or decades, which have shaped their lives and experiences. Trump is not such a conservative. Sorry. Just the way I see it.
And that is just one example of what I am talking about.
Do your own research. Without using any birther websites, try to find the source of that particular piece of information. If you are truly interested in "the facts", you will discover a payment from the Obama campaign to a law firm, something every campaign does, in amounts similar to what Obama has paid. However, what you won't find, is what services were rendered for those payments. And so, the "facts" are, birthers have no actual proof that Obama has "spent so much money" hiding anything.
Be equally skeptical of all claims and you'll find out why so many conservatives won't buy into birtherism. Too many unsubstantiated claims.
On the second issue, Trump is not a conservative, he's a wheeler dealer
I like the way you think. Trumps in this deal for Trump. He may try to pull a turd party but he won’t fool the patriots like perot did. The downside of a second Bambi Regime’s too much for anybody to contemplate.
I have sent O’Reilly several explanations of the dual bases of the definition of “natural born citizen,” as used in the Constitutional specification of eligibility for election to the office of President of the U.S.A., to no avail. Also sent him the Canada Free Press article that was posted today on FreeRepublic. He ignores it to his further discreditation.
Here’s what I sent to the Tea Party:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2698187/posts?page=5#5
They replied that I was confused, hmmm!!!
I am curious. Do you do that with your faith?
Of course, neither does Obama's "recorded" history.
I agree with you. I will neither support nor vote for anyone who does not think that being provably eligible for the presidency is essential.
It is disrespecting the Constitution. It is the same as saying that illegal aliens deserve all rights of US citizens. This kind of thinking is killing us and our Republic.
“Birthers” are so insanely focused on this one issue that everything else pales in comparison. That’s why Beck mocks them.
OF COURSE there are legitimate questions about the issue of his birth certificate — namely, why won’t he just RELEASE the thing?! What’s there to hide? I’m not some tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist (like many “Birther’s,” which is EXACTLY what Obama is trying to PUSH them into becoming in the public’s perception — and it’s WORKING. And Beck KNOWS this). But even I know there’s SOMETHING Barry doesn’t want exposed ON or ABOUT his birth certificate.
So, stop worrying about Beck. He’s trying to save the tin-foil hat wearers from themselves. If you are one, you don’t agree with him, and you’re angry with him. Change the station. Don’t listen, don’t watch. Just dig for that Birth Certificate, fixate on it and forget about all the other problems we face right now.
If it’s okay, a few of the rest of us will TRY to think about other minor issues the country is facing at this particular moment. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.