Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who has gotten to Glenn Beck?
The Radio Patriot ^ | April 2, 2011 | Andrea Shea King

Posted on 04/02/2011 8:54:17 AM PDT by patriotgal1787

. . . . .

Dear readers,

If I've said it once, I've said it a hundred times or more --- how can a guy who does as much reporting on what's going on in the World of Soros miss this? How can a guy who claims to be able to piece disparate pieces together to see the big picture miss this? How can a guy who tells his viewers and listeners to "Question with Boldness" and seek the truth because "The Truth Has No Agenda" deliberately turn his back on what is so glaringly obvious to millions of us? If he can uncover and report day after day on the evil being perpetrated on America by some of the most powerful people in the world, why won't he report on this?

Glenn Beck is anything but stupid. The incredibly talented Beck is nobody's fool. He knows better than most about what is going on behind the curtain, under the surface, in the back rooms. So what gives?

Has he been told to keep his mouth shut? Has he been told his children's lives are in danger if he shines a spotlight on Obama's eligibility? Has he been told he can go anywhere but "there"? Is the truth something so horrible he refrains from telling us because... because... what?

And if Beck's been threatened, what makes this any different from all the other threats he's received that requires him to have 24-hour security protection? What's he been told? Who told him? What does Beck know that we don't?

For a guy who claims to have America's best interests at heart and has dedicated his career to promoting and educating America about the values and history of our Founders and the founding documents, why does he actively disparage those who do "question with boldness" this socialist mystery man in our White House? Who has gotten to Beck?

On this very serious issue, Beck is playing the fool -- the rodeo clown. And never more so than when he makes his weekly appearances as the galoomphy buffoon playing off Bill O'Bloviator's superciliousness. (Lord, that man is an overrated ignoramus.)

When Beck starts with this foolishness, I turn him off. His mockery of those who question with boldness about something he obviously does not want to go near, insults us all. I am personally disappointed in him. And sadly, reluctantly, question his credibility. Every time he opens his mouth to disparage "birthers", he damages himself in the eyes of millions. I shake my head in wonderment. How can he be so stupid? If he honestly doesn't agree that it is a major issue, just shut up about it already. Why insult most of your audience? Or is he trying to signal us that this is such a dangerous area that he is dissuading us from pursuing it? It is baffling.

Note in the video below that Beck and O'Bloviator never address the essential issue Trump has brought forward about Obama's eligibility. Instead they dissect why Trump is making "provocative" statements, deciding it's "because he likes the attention."

O'Bloviator's so ignorant, one wouldn't expect him to think it through any deeper than "announcements were published int he newspaper. But Beck is brighter than that. He's not a stupid man. So who has gotten to him? Who has gotten to Beck???

Pay close attention to what O'Bloviator says at the very end of the segment when he responds to Beck's comment about stating the truth of what's going on: "But then you and I would be off the air."

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-m8W8xc9AoE&feature=player_embedded#at=19]

. . . . .


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: beck; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; donaldtrump; glennbeck; naturalborncitizen; obama; wrldsdmbstcnsprcy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-218 next last
To: ml/nj
It sort of blows the lid off the official Obama bio

And what exactly does that accomplish in terms of defeating Obama?

But you don't care. Orly Taitz is just a buffoon.

So true. She's good comedy though.

Sarah Palin is a buffoon.

I was unaware of that. What makes you think so?

Dan Quayle is a buffoon.

I'm good with that. Is he somehow relevant to the issue?

Ronald Reagan is a buffoon.

How do you figure that?

Al Gore, now there's a man with real brains.

Are you drunk?

121 posted on 04/02/2011 12:31:09 PM PDT by humblegunner (Blogger Overlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Hmmmm, “supposed” father a citizen of Kenya. Fact? If he is truly Barack Hussein Obama Jr., his father was not a citizen of The United States of America at Jr.’s birth.

He was adopted by a man in Indonesia and became an Indonesian citizen. He enrolled at Occidental as a foreign student by the name of Barry Soetoro.

What it your definition of a natural born citizen? Is it acceptable under our Constitution to have dual citizenship?


122 posted on 04/02/2011 12:42:24 PM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

"YOU HAVE MEDDLED WITH THE PRIMAL FORCES OF NATURE, MR. BECK....AND....YOU....WILL....ATONE!"

123 posted on 04/02/2011 12:43:59 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher

“Birthers” are so insanely focused on this one issue that everything else pales in comparison. That’s why Beck mocks them.

Now, that’s a bizarre thought. What better an explanation for everything Beck DOES investigate - our “President”’s allegiances lie elsewhere. Now that’s insane, isn’t it? More like: It’s the root of the problem.


124 posted on 04/02/2011 12:46:48 PM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Bluebird Singing
“Birthers” are so insanely focused on this one issue that everything else pales in comparison. That’s why Beck mocks them.

Sorry, but this is a ridiculous faither canard. Donald Trump nailed Obama on failing to legally corroborate his jpg and has nailed him on several other issues. Calling skeptics stupid names like "birther" is more insane than what you claim.

125 posted on 04/02/2011 12:51:15 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak
I think it's possible he's being cautious because he thinks the administration is hoping to get conservatives out on a limb before they release something to “prove” Obama is “legit”, and doesn't want to be discredited.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

If this is a political dirty trick then the American people would be right to suspect that Obama pulls wings off flies just for the fun of seeing them squirm!

And....How is it possible to discredit **FACT**??? Hm?

FACT: The only “evidence” seen were Internet images of dubious origin that seem to have been forged, two or three legally masturbated statements from Hawaiian officials that clarify NOTHING, and hearsay from Lingle.

FACT: Only a psychopathic monster would withhold COMMON documents and allow a decorated officer go to prison and have another officer have his career in ruins.

FACT: Obama wasted thousands of TAX dollars on court time and the time of GOVERNMENT attorneys in an effort to prevent the release of common documents. He misused TAX dollars and Department of Justice resources at a time when plots were being laid to blow up Times Square and a Pittsburgh marathon, explode a plane over Detroit, and **KILL** our soldiers on their bases and recruitment centers.

126 posted on 04/02/2011 12:53:20 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: edge919

I was quoting someone else’s reply.


127 posted on 04/02/2011 12:57:36 PM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
Sorry...I've watched Polarik's little Photoshop videos with their Batman TV show "Pow" graphics and their imitation Jerry Bruckheimer production music, and it doesn't prove anything. He's never had access to the original document. He's also been caught claiming a real document was a fraud.

It's hard to take him seriously when he also tries to sell himself as a relationship expert for 2 bucks a minute.

128 posted on 04/02/2011 1:08:00 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Stanley Ann was married to Obama Sr

There is no documentation to support that statement.

129 posted on 04/02/2011 1:09:57 PM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Bluebird Singing

I responded to the comment. Patriot Preacher or whoever made the original comment can hopefully see it and decide whether to respond.


130 posted on 04/02/2011 1:12:25 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Bluebird Singing
Hmmmm, “supposed” father a citizen of Kenya. Fact? If he is truly Barack Hussein Obama Jr., his father was not a citizen of The United States of America at Jr.’s birth.

A fact undisputed by Obama, published in his book, and well known before the 2008 election. Now what?

What it your definition of a natural born citizen? Is it acceptable under our Constitution to have dual citizenship?

Convince The Heritage Foundation or Landmark Legal Foundation of your requirements for presidential qualifications and get back to me.

131 posted on 04/02/2011 1:15:54 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
He's never had access to the original document.

Apparently no one has had access to the original document. Polarik's analyis aside, the scans presented by Obama were photoshopped. This is indisputable. The photographs taken by factlack dot org have their own problems ... namely a document that doesn't match Obama's original scan(s). Donald Trump managed to find a corroborating document when his first birth certificate was disputed. Obama has not.

132 posted on 04/02/2011 1:16:29 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Stanley Ann was married to Obama Sr

There is no documentation to support that statement.

maybe no reliable documentation, but the Hawaii DOH has it documented...

MARRIAGE INDEX — OFFICE OF HEALTH STATUS MONITORING
GROOM — OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN
BRIDE — DUNHAN, STANLEY ANN


133 posted on 04/02/2011 1:17:49 PM PDT by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
Convince The Heritage Foundation or Landmark Legal Foundation of your requirements for presidential qualifications and get back to me.

Uh my opinion is as good as anyones. Until the SCOTUS (less 2 hacks that need to recuse themselves) decides, I'll stick with mine.

134 posted on 04/02/2011 1:22:25 PM PDT by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
A fact undisputed by Obama, published in his book, and well known before the 2008 election. Now what? Convince The Heritage Foundation or Landmark Legal Foundation of your requirements for presidential qualifications and get back to me.

This is a stupid suggestion. The people to convince are the local state election boards. In Hawaii, for example, Obama's inclusion on the ballot can be contested on the basis of ineligibility. The board is required to give a public hearing. At such a time, any challenger would be able to make a case based on the Supreme Court's definition of natural born citizen and try to bar Obama from being on the ballot. A challenged may actually at that point have standing and a direct and tangible interest in order to get legal documentation from the HI DOH for Obama's birth records. Illinois has a similar law and there may other states as well.

135 posted on 04/02/2011 1:24:30 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: x

recent poll says 625 of republicans question o’s birt.


136 posted on 04/02/2011 1:33:23 PM PDT by stockpirate (Rebellion to tyranny is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

“Go further. The inconsistencies in Obama’s own story of his past. No College Transcripts, No Medical Records, No nothing. It’s almost as if the guy was a ghost, and if anyone questions this, they’re labeled crazy or a racist.”

Ha ha, or even WORSE a birther!


137 posted on 04/02/2011 1:33:29 PM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

sorry 62 %


138 posted on 04/02/2011 1:33:58 PM PDT by stockpirate (Rebellion to tyranny is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

“My” requirements. You are so funny.


139 posted on 04/02/2011 1:36:13 PM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
Sorry...I've watched Polarik's little Photoshop videos with their Batman TV show "Pow" graphics and their imitation Jerry Bruckheimer production music, and it doesn't prove anything.

I don't think much of his videos either. But maybe he thought that was the most effective way to bring his insight to a wider audience. He sure didn't get much traction when he just did standard analysis stuff.

He's never had access to the original document.

I never had access to the supposed Vincent Foster torn note. Not only that, but I have no expertise whatsoever in document authentication. But the day the WSJ published an image of the note, I was on usenet suggesting why it was a fraud. What I posted has been quoted many times since. It's pretty obvious that one can determine that some images or copies are fraudulent without needing to see an original. To say for sure that something is genuine is a different thing. You need access to the original document and you need experience.

He's also been caught claiming a real document was a fraud.

I'm not aware of this. Could you provide more information?

Even if true, it doesn't discredit the points he made which seemed well reasoned to me.

ML/NJ

140 posted on 04/02/2011 1:50:09 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson