Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: wtc911
"Well, she could push through another windfall profits tax on big oil then give a check to everyone in the country. You know, just like she did in Alaska."

Do you mean our Permanent Fund Dividend checks? These come as dividends to stockholders. A percentage of oil royalties paid to the State are invested in a Permanent Fund, which is in turn invested in the national and international market. Once each year, the dividends on these investments are calculated and divided among the stockholders (thats us, we Alaskans). Sarah Palin was not the designer of, nor had she anything to do with this program. It was put into place before the pipeline was built, back in the Seventies.

101 posted on 03/27/2011 1:13:51 PM PDT by redhead ("I think I'm the best fish filleter in the whole third grade." --Piper Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: redhead

This might help you get up to speed on what Palin did as Governor. She did in deed impose a “Windfall” tax. To cover increases in the price of oil. Read the whole article. explains it in great detail, especially in regards to the Permanent Fund;

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2014601450_alaska27.html


103 posted on 03/27/2011 1:19:47 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: redhead
No, that is the royalty planand it was already in place.

This additional tax was SP's baby and was layered on top of the royalties and other existing fees. It was an aggressive progressive tax on net profits.

According to industry officials it brought Alaska's share of revenue (revenue - not profits) up to 75%.

Part of the revenue derived from this additional tax did go to Alaskans in the form of a check. But, and this is key, this was not an agreed upon quid pro quo driven royalty...it was a levied tax and as with any tax those entities paying had no say in the matter.

To take it a step further, it was a tax (confiscation) of corporate revenues for the purpose of re-distribution.

106 posted on 03/27/2011 1:26:36 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson