Ping!
STE=Q
Nor is it the same as native-born.
The apparent new 0dumbo spin is that a natural born citizen is one who is born in USA versus a naturalized citizen
BUT I do not think there was status called naturalized citizen in 1789.
No Dem has evern had a good explanation for why only the POTUS must be ‘ natural born” as proscribed by our Constitution.
If King Obama has his way, we’ll be re-classified as Natural Born ‘Subjects’.
Cheers
Doubting Donald? Now Trump wonders about Obama eligibility
Tells ABC: ‘The reason is because he grew up and nobody knew him’
Read more: Doubting Donald? Now Trump wonders about Obama eligibility http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=276269#ixzz1GtPVnY26
The problem with this article is that while it recognizes that the Supreme Court, a great many moons ago, long before PC ruled the land, held that the two terms are indeed more or less the same, the author disagrees.
So for his issue to become effective law the Court would have to reverse itself on a precedent that has stood more or less unchallenged for well over 100 years. For obvious reasons, this ain’t likely to happen.
I don’t know where Soetoro was born but I suspect he is a dual citizen—country of birth/Indonesia—which would disqualify him from the presidency. This needs to be settled in court. We also need to get to the bottom of why he uses multiple Social Security numbers.
Subjects are a conquered people living in the city or country of the conqueror..
Thanks for posting
ML/NJ
obumpa