Skip to comments.
Don't underestimate Newt Gingrich
The Washington Examiner ^
| March 3, 2011
| Christopher Malagisi
Posted on 03/03/2011 11:04:50 AM PST by 6ft2inhighheelshoes
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Christopher is a smart and savvy guy, and I wouldn't underestimate his opinion
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Oh heck, I’ll go first and misunderestimate Newt!
PS: I really like his alternative history books, though.
2
posted on
03/03/2011 11:06:59 AM PST
by
RexBeach
(There is no such thing as a good tax.- Winston Churchill)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
3
posted on
03/03/2011 11:07:01 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Don't underestimate how badly Newt is damaged goods.
4
posted on
03/03/2011 11:07:30 AM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
5
posted on
03/03/2011 11:09:57 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Newt Samsonite Gingrich and Clarrisa/Calissta = wife #3? I think not.
6
posted on
03/03/2011 11:11:20 AM PST
by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Is it possible that Gingrich has analyzed his own history, learned the lessons from the 1990s, and can have his own political comeback in 2012? The answer is NO, and Newt is delusional to think he can win. The left-wing media won't stop hammering him about the 3 wives, and how he cheated on the first 2.
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Good article...Gingrich will raise the level of the debates and hopefully raise the game of the mediocre field we have...magritte
8
posted on
03/03/2011 11:12:30 AM PST
by
magritte
("There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself "Do trousers matter?")
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
‘In any presidential primary, party members traditionally look for someone not only who can carry the party mantle but who can potentially win.’
In the end tho its all about winning not representing any particular set of ideas or even upholding the Constitution. I think he could pull that off b/c like all modern day pols he’ll morph to make himself sellable to the highest bidder. His core values aren’t terribly different than the tards. Is this what we really want as a follow on to Barry Soetoro? I don’t think so. Winning isn’t isn’t what this country needs but I suspect that’s what we’ll get.
9
posted on
03/03/2011 11:14:14 AM PST
by
556x45
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Let me give Newt a grade: As a RINO, I would say that Luger and Snow are tens. At that rate I would put Newt about six. in other words not the worst RINO we have but still too much RINO. Newt and Rove are both of the Elite Republican Party. Let's stick with TEA Party people.
10
posted on
03/03/2011 11:15:52 AM PST
by
fish hawk
(R. Emmett Tyrrell: Liberalism is dead. What we see now is "soft Nazis-ism".)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Newt is the poster boy for why the Left seems to always win in America. He played hardball in ‘95 and the Dems went all out crazy attacking him. The GOP dumped their best chance to clean up washington. If someone that effective were on the Commie side they’d have made him a saint and built an airport named after him already. Don’t get me wrong, a scummy guy but get the point.
11
posted on
03/03/2011 11:16:50 AM PST
by
Rippin
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Newt? I dunno. I was amazed with him in 1994. But if I remember correctly, watching him on talk shows recently he is for amnesty for illegals and carries alot of baggage. I really do not trust him, but he is a shining star standing standing next to the compost pile now in the White House.
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
This reads like his third wife wrote this.
13
posted on
03/03/2011 11:17:13 AM PST
by
capydick
(''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Don’t underestimate Newt Gingrich, especially if you’re married to him, and are hospitalized for cancer treatment.
14
posted on
03/03/2011 11:19:32 AM PST
by
flowerplough
(Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
15
posted on
03/03/2011 11:20:11 AM PST
by
Emperor Palpatine
(Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
16
posted on
03/03/2011 11:20:31 AM PST
by
Reagan69
(I went to a shooting-victims' memorial service and all I got was a lousy T-shirt !)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Don’t underestimate our aversion for Newt.
If he becomes the Publican Presidential Candidate, I will be voting 3rd party.
I’d rather have Barry driving us into the dirt in broad daylight than Newt doing it in the smokey back rooms.
17
posted on
03/03/2011 11:20:43 AM PST
by
Westbrook
(Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
18
posted on
03/03/2011 11:20:52 AM PST
by
CPT Clay
(Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
To: 556x45
"party members traditionally look for someone not only who can carry the party mantle but who can potentially win."
Oh, so that explains McCain, Dole, et. al.
19
posted on
03/03/2011 11:23:09 AM PST
by
Emperor Palpatine
(Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!)
To: RexBeach
I really like his alternative history books, though. Then maybe you should vote for William R. Forstchen (i.e. the guy who actually wrote them).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson