Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Similarities Between Islam and Communism
Beyond the Cusp ^ | February 25, 2011 | B. Saunders

Posted on 02/25/2011 6:06:31 AM PST by bsaunders

When many people think of Islam they tend to believe that which they have been told endlessly by politicians, journalists, academics, and other sources of presumed authority that Islam is simply a religion that, like most religions we know, values peace and shares many of our values in the West. Nothing could be further from the truth. If I was pressed to define Islam in terms that many in the West are far more familiar with, I would equate it with Communism with the difference being instead of the superiority of the State, the Laws of the State, and the Party Leaders being the final authority in Communism, Islam replaces the State with Allah, the State Laws with the Koran and the Hadith, and the Party Leaders with the Imams.

Further investigation leads to numerous other similarities. In Communism one is expected to fully surrender themselves to the dictates of the State while Islam demands on surrendering themselves to Allah and the defined laws attributed to Allah by Muhammad. Communism grants to the Party Leaders the power to define the desires and rules of the State while Islam gives the power to issue religious edicts known a Fatwas to the Imams. In addition, the Imams also have the power to choose which verses of the Koran, as many are contradictory, the faithful must follow and also interpret the Hadiths and define the actions attributed to Muhammad which are to be imitated by true followers of Islam.

Communism fully expected that their form of governance was superior and would inevitably spread throughout the world, even if it needed a little help by conquest when any resisted the march of Communism. Communists defined peace as the lack of opposition thus peace could only be attained once everyone had surrendered and fallen under the control of the World-Wide Communist State. Islam believes it is the final and ultimate religion and fully defines what one must obey to lead a perfect life. Islamic leaders and many of their followers believe that not only is Islam the only true path, but that Islam must be spread, even by the sword, until every single person has surrendered to Allah and follows the edicts of the Imams. Islam divides the world into two states, the World of Islam (Dar al-Islam) and the World of War (Dar al-Harb). In Islam peace is defined as the point at which the entire population of the world follows Islam and fully surrenders to Allah and Islam.

Communism often used propaganda and would intentionally misrepresent production in order to guarantee that every quota set was met or exceeded. Misrepresenting and outright falsehoods would be used by Communist countries, especially in negotiations with non-Communist nations and would break treaties whenever it served their purposes. In Islam, all these same attributes are referred to as Taqiyya. In simple English one would define Taqiyya as lying. In a political and more general sense Taqiyya would be considered as propaganda, misrepresentation, or misleading all in an effort to further the aims of Islam, especially in order to gain influence or territories. Further, should one reach a treaty of peace with an Islamic Country, they would refer to the negotiation not to be an actual peace treaty but rather a Hudna. A Hudna is, in truth, a truce negotiated not to exceed ten years and may be broken at any point where the Muslim side feels it then has gained military advantage and will defeat their foe. A Hudna is the only allowance in Islam to be negotiated between Islamic entities and any non-Islamic entities. The only real peace in Islam is the complete and total defeat and surrender of the foes of Islam, thus no such thing as a peace treaty can be negotiated with an Islamic Country.

In Communist States the Party Leaders are considered infallible and their rule is absolute. Party Leaders have the power to arbitrarily change the rules and invent charges in order to arrest and remove any persons who are seen as obstructing the State and imprison them in a work camp for life or execute them should they pose a real threat. In Islam the Imams are considered to speak for Allah as his representatives on Earth and as such are infallible. The Imams have the power to arbitrarily change the rules as they see fit and accuse and convict any person who has become troublesome of working against Allah and thus be incarcerated indefinitely or simply executed.

The actual difference between Communism and Islam is one of emphasis. Communism is a form of governance that makes the State the highest authority and thus makes worship of the state as a substitute for religion. Islam is a religion that has total rules for all aspects of life including the establishment of a theocracy placing the Imams, Islamic religious leaders, as the rulers, courts, and authority responsible for governance as demanded by their religion. To put it in a nutshell, Communism is governance usurping the House of Religion; Islam is religion usurping the Halls of Governance.

Beyond the Cusp


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: communism; islam
Thank you for taking your time to read. Hope it was at least a little informative, but Free Republic is a tough sell as all are so well informed to begin with. Thanx
1 posted on 02/25/2011 6:06:35 AM PST by bsaunders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bsaunders
The crescent moon looks a whole lot like the sickle.
2 posted on 02/25/2011 6:09:40 AM PST by deadrock (Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle. Philo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bsaunders

I am glad someone is pointing this out. Communism run by the IMAMS is a perfect Misery Match. It fits. Islamomarxism.


3 posted on 02/25/2011 6:10:38 AM PST by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

and the software solution for shaping/ hi jacking public opinion that Obama seeks is consistent with the propaganda tools......


4 posted on 02/25/2011 6:17:17 AM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bsaunders

I think Islam is more closely related to fascism than communism, but it ain’t good regardless.


5 posted on 02/25/2011 6:22:58 AM PST by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DEADROCK

Under commienilism no one had to get on their knees and moon the West.
They mass moon US, and we don’t see it???? Right on the streets of Manhattan!


6 posted on 02/25/2011 6:23:53 AM PST by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee-ssed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bsaunders

Very good article.

Both are world-domination ideologies that choose to spread by any means necessary. Both demand complete submission to the collectivity. Both claim to be the only source of moral authority, and so Church and Synagogue have to be eliminated. Both make their people unhappy, poor, angry and miserable. Both are capable of holding two contradictory thoughts in their “minds” at the same time.


7 posted on 02/25/2011 6:35:33 AM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (Liberalism is against human nature. Practicing liberalism is detrimental to your mental stability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bsaunders
I saw a similarity between radical Islam and Communism (totalitarianism) myself. All it took was reading the "Sayyid Qutb Reader."
8 posted on 02/25/2011 6:48:53 AM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bsaunders
Regarding your own piece: the form of Islamist government isn't quite the same because the imams tend to be above the government rather than being directly in charge. Central to Qutb's ideology is the idea that modern governments in Islamic states are pagan. Qutb doesn't demand that imams rule; he just wants rulers to submit to Sharia. That's easier if the formal rulers are not imans, as it leaves radical imans as checkers on (or overseers of) the ruler(s). Sharia law takes the place of the central plan in Islamism.
9 posted on 02/25/2011 6:55:49 AM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bsaunders

Bump for later..


10 posted on 02/25/2011 7:00:34 AM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bsaunders

It’s one reason why we’re seeing an increasing alliance between Islam and the Left. What the Left is really interested in is a totalitarian, completely planned, society. Islam aligns with their world-view.


11 posted on 02/25/2011 7:10:54 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

our commie wimin and homosexuals aren’t gonna like what sharia has in store for them


12 posted on 02/25/2011 7:41:11 AM PST by stickywillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson