Mike Gallagher Practically Endorses Palin for President

The Mike Gallagher Show, via PalinTV ^ | February 24, 2011 | Mike Gallagher

[Virginia Ridgerunner]

“I am becoming completely convinced that she should run.”

[unseen1]

ROFL.....yeah discarding a timex because you found a rolex is insanity.....

[unseen1]

Agree with Rush as #1. when he leaves his job the conservatives will have a smaller voice....

Levin is good he gets on my nerves at times. Savage the same. Beck I can listen to in small doses his end of the world view is depressing if you get too much of it but he is able to put things together nicely.

Can't stand Steyn at all.
And not a fan of Ingram either.

Todd Snit is one of the worse IMO.

Gallagher is pretty good on the radio and on TV.

The rest you mention are ok at best....

compared to RUSH they are all second stringers... Hannity’s constant repeating of GOP talking points gets very old very fast...

[unseen1]

It makes 4. Rush, Mark, savage and now Mike. Have all said Palin is the best of the lot

[Hawthorn]

You put Mark Davis on your top ten list? Wow! You seem to be the only FReeper I've encountered who thinks he belongs anywhere but on the bottom ten list! When he subs for Rush, it's a Dennis Prager day for me.

[erod]

Savage endorsed Sarah? Did i just hear that correctly? He was pushing Scott Brown when I listened to him over a year ago, and that’s one of the reasons why I stopped listening.

[erod]

Who are you backing for president. You don’t have to give me a concrete answer, but could you at least name your top 3?

[perfect_rovian_storm]

Savage? Last I heard he was attacking her with the same disingenuous jackassery that these trolls here on FR attack her with.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

My 11 years of posting history here, prove your theory wrong n00b. But nice try anyway. I don't rile up easily, especially by the likes of you.

[perfect_rovian_storm]

We do stand in solidarity to pick a real winner this time, which will emerge when the election season starts

And in the meantime, you'll do your best to 'stand in solidarity' with conservatives by repeating tired talking points incessantly and accusing everyone who disagrees with you of idol worship. How nice.

[erod]

Who are you backing for president. You don’t have to give me a concrete answer, but could you at least name your top 3?

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

At the present point? I would pick someone like Ryan, DeMint, or Caine. Like I said earlier, there is plenty of time to pick a good candidate. Being patient and careful is what needs to be the focus this time around, or it will wind up like 2008 all over again; A complete disaster!

[perfect_rovian_storm]

Your eleven years of posting history has been rendered irrelevant by your crusade that seems to involve waiting to post negativity on EVERY Palin thread. Then, you laughably express a desire for 'solidarity'.

You may not have started out as a troll, but you've certainly become one of late. A quick perusal of your posting history clearly illustrate that.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

That’s funny, I was about to say the same thing about Palin fanatics, but you beat me to it.

[Hawthorn]

>> Who are you backing for president? <<

1. Scott Walker

2. Herman Cain

3. Chris Christie

[perfect_rovian_storm]

Ryan: A house member and awfully young. Also isn’t running and won’t run.

DeMint: Nice choice, but he isn’t going to run and has been very clear about that.

Cain: He’s good. I have my doubts about him gaining traction, but I’d gladly support him and unlike your other mentions, he actually is running. However, you should learn to spell his name before you attempt use him as a crutch to prop up your chronic cranial rectitis.

So, we are left to come to the conclusion that you are a Herman Cain supporter. Good to know.

[erod]

Thanks

[perfect_rovian_storm]

That’s funny, I was about to say the same thing about Palin fanatics, but you beat me to it.

Is that so? You'd be laughably incorrect if you did. I don't see any Palin supporters waiting around for Herman Cain threads to be started so they can call the people who post in his support 'fanatics'. Yet, Palin supporters have you to contend with on damn near every thread. It seems to me that under any objective definition of the word, your behavior is more indicative of fanaticism.

[unseen1]

first time i’ve seen a 6 year member called a noob but you go with that....

[unseen1]

http://conservatives4palin.com/2011/01/michael-savage-sarah-palin-has-shown-herself-to-be-a-true-leader.html

[unseen1]

He changed his mind during the blood libel when she gave her speech

http://conservatives4palin.com/2011/01/michael-savage-sarah-palin-has-shown-herself-to-be-a-true-leader.html