[Red Badger]

Every law he’s signed,
Every appointment he’s made,
Every Executive Order he’s issued,
Everything he’s done in office is on the line..........

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

Hemenway wrote the, "We have not exaggerated in presenting the question of the constitutional rule of law being at stake in this matter," Hemenway wrote in a petition for rehearing before the high court. "A man has successfully run for the office of president and has done so, it appears, with an awareness that he is not eligible under the constitutional requirement for a person to be president.

Case motion for recusal of Sotomayor and Kagan "Despite a vigorous campaign that he has conducted to make 'unthinkable' the very idea of raising the issue of his eligibility under the Constitution to 'be' president the issue has not gone away," Hemenway said.

"Instead it has steadily grown in the awareness of the public. Should we be surprised that he shows no respect for the constitutional rule of law? What else would we expect?" he wrote.

The U.S. Supreme Court today did not respond to WND questions today about whether the two justices would participate in the conference, and there was no response to WND's request that questions be forwarded to the justices themselves about their plans.

"The real question here is one of getting members of the judiciary to take seriously the oath that they swore to protect and preserve the Constitution," Hemenway wrote in his petition for rehearing. "To continue to avoid the issue will destroy the constitutional rule of law basis of our legal system when it is under vigorous assault as surely as if the conscious decision were made to cease preserving and protecting our founding charter."

That the justices are "avoiding" the Obama issue already has been confirmed by one member of the court. It was last year when Justice Clarence Thomas appeared before a U.S. House subcommittee that the issue arose.

Read more: Stunner! Supremes to give eligibility case another look http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=264897#ixzz1EFkrwg3Y

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

Everything he’s done in office is on the line..........

Including appointing the two justices, which is clear cause for them to recuse?

[freebird5850]

“Every law he’s signed,
Every appointment he’s made,
Every Executive Order he’s issued,
Everything he’s done in office is on the line..........”

Fingers crossed. God save our country.

[Anima Mundi]

Sounds like a movie blurb if you think of it in that whispery voice.

[DoughtyOne]

Every humiliating bow on my behalf...

Maybe they read my tagline and were embarrassed.

[adorno]

Every law he’s signed, Every appointment he’s made, Every Executive Order he’s issued, Everything he’s done in office is on the line..........

Will we be able to get back the trillion dollars spent as "stimulus"?
Will GM and Chrysler have to go back to being broke and maybe out of business?

Will the people who were sent into battle by Obama and died be brought back to life?

Far too many things that should not have happened because somebody was elected president and was not even legally qualified to run.

[Mad Dawgg]

"Every law he’s signed,
Every appointment he’s made,
Every Executive Order he’s issued,
Everything he’s done in office is on the line.........."

The very definition of a Constitutional Crisis.

Let us say the Supremes find that Obama did not meet the requirements to be President:

Can he be Impeached? He is technically not President and if so how do you impeach someone who isn't President?

But if he is not President then Biden Technically would not be Vice President because of the way the Constitution was Amended for Presidential Elections.

So does this mean its President Boehner?

If so I can guarantee you there would be race riots in the largest of our nations cities at the very least.

And I guarantee you the Supremes know this also!