Physician-Assisted Suicides in Oregon in 2010 Even More Unknown Information

Euthanasia Prevention Coalition ^ | 1/28/11 | Alex Schadenberg

[wagglebee]

The 2010, annual Oregon Death with Dignity report was recently released.

The most important message is what it doesn't tell us. It doesn't tell us whether the person who died consented when the lethal dose was administered.

Further to that, the physician is rarely present at the time the lethal dose is administered. If the person does not consent, who would know?

The reporting system has a conflict of interest, whereby the physician who wrote the lethal prescription submits the report. The physician will not admit to abuse.

The Physicians for Compassionate Care sent out a press release yesterday concerning the 2010 Death with Dignity annual report from Oregon. Link to the press release

Physicians for Compassionate Care Education Foundation

Press Release January 27, 2011

Physician-Assisted Suicides in Oregon in 2010 - Even More Unknown Information

The annual report from the Oregon Public Health Division (OPHD) regarding physician-assisted suicides in 2010 has been released this month, and contains information received by them as of January 7, 2011. This release of information is occurring two months earlier in the year than for prior years’ reports. Because of the hastiness in releasing the report, they acknowledge that not all information for 2010 has been received by them. PCCEF is concerned with multiple areas of the OPHD report on Oregon assisted suicides for the 2010 year.

* The report is incomplete. Specifically, they have not received information on 15 patients for whom prescriptions were written in 2010.

* The report acknowledges 65 individuals who died from physician-assisted suicide in 2010, yet concedes there may be others who have died in 2010 for whom they have not received information.

* Not all who attempt to take the [lethal dose] will die. Overdoses failed to cause two individuals to die. One regained consciousness within 24 hours and died of the underlying illness five days later. Another gained consciousness 3½ days after ingestion and died of the underlying illness three months later. Vomiting was reported in both people. These are not easy drugs to take, and they are very bitter and foul-tasting drugs. The report fails to detail why these two people chose not to repeat an overdose. Perhaps they found the experience less pleasant than the promoters led them to believe.

* Only one of the 65 had a psychiatric or psychological referral. OHSU researchers in 2008 reported that 25% of patients requesting assisted suicide were considered to be depressed. There continues to be no protection for depressed patients in Oregon.

* The report has far more unknown information than has ever previously been reported:

Category Unknown Information

* Complications for 37 of 65 patients
* Emergency Medical Services called for 37 of 65 patients
* Minutes between ingestion & unconsciousness for 33 of 65 patients
* Minutes between ingestion & death for 33 of 65 patients

When such a substantial proportion of important information is unknown, how are Oregonians to know what is really happening with assisted suicides in the state?

Physicians for Compassionate Care Education Foundation promotes the ethic that all human life has inherent value and that physician-assisted suicide:

* Undermines trust in the patient-physician relationship.

* Changes the societal role of the physician from healing to medical killing.

* Endangers the value that society places on life, specifically for those who are most vulnerable, those who are frail, elderly, and at the end of life.

[wagglebee]

The most important message is what it doesn't tell us. It doesn't tell us whether the person who died consented when the lethal dose was administered.

That's because "right to die" is nothing more than a prelude to "duty to die."

[wagglebee]

Pro-Life Ping

[wagglebee]

Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[trisham]

“Death with dignity”. What a lie. If they were honest, it would be “murder with impunity”.

[wagglebee]

Ping

[wagglebee]

If they were honest, it would be “murder with impunity”.

That's certainly their goal.

[DonaldC]

““Death with dignity”. What a lie. If they were honest, it would be “murder with impunity”.”

That is certainly a risk, but I think there are cases where an individual should have that choice. We make people suffer far longer than we would allow a dog with the same ailment.

[Rocky]

It doesn't tell us whether the person who died consented when the lethal dose was administered.

It's a slippery slope. Compassion sometimes clouds the judgment and opens the door for greater evil.

[trisham]

Did you read the article?

[wagglebee]

We make people suffer far longer than we would allow a dog with the same ailment.

You couldn't be more wrong. Modern palliative care methods, including the ability to medically induce a coma, have all but eliminated any pain associated with terminal illnesses.

[tutstar]

bump

[Salvation]

If you aren't on this ping list and are interested

in articles about Oregon, please FReepmail me.

[little jeremiah]

The rest of the hideous story. But not all of it, there is so much more.