Good grief, these people will do anything to promote socialism, like they think we're all stupid.
1 posted on
01/28/2011 6:12:07 AM PST by
FredJake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: FredJake
I just cancelled my SA subscription.
2 posted on
01/28/2011 6:18:37 AM PST by
BuffaloJack
(Re-Elect President Sarah Palin 2016)
To: FredJake
But I find it persuasive, especially because it points toward an attractive solution... That's not "science."
That's personal prejudice with a false-veneer of science.
3 posted on
01/28/2011 6:19:32 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
To: FredJake
Try using the DP more often, locking them up for full sentences, and NO DAMN plea bargaining. NO Glamor slammers either.
4 posted on
01/28/2011 6:20:38 AM PST by
GailA
(2012 rally cry DEMOCRATS and RINOS are BAD for the USA!)
To: FredJake
gun crime is low under communism? well of course... they have a death penalty for nearly everything. on top of that, communism likes to wipe out a large chunk of the population when it starts... 24m for the USSR, Mao.. 50m +
bring it to the US... 30m easy
funny how the incidents of crime decrease when you kill or threaten to kill everyone
5 posted on
01/28/2011 6:22:11 AM PST by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: FredJake
So the moron wants to go from individual murderers like Jared Loughman to State Murderers like Stalin?
I’d rather take my chances with individual nutballs, thank you. At least I can shoot back with some hope of winning.
7 posted on
01/28/2011 6:25:35 AM PST by
Little Ray
(The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
To: FredJake
aturally, some researchers have reported data that fail to support the income-inequality theory of homicide.What a straw man. One that only the least intelligent couldn't knock down.
First-There are 50-80 million gun owners in this country. There are VASTLY more gun owners with guns THAT DON'T commit murders than do. So GUNS themselves aren't the issue.
Second-There are millions of poor people in this country who DON'T commit crimes. IF income inequality was the cause, WHY DON'T these people commit crimes also?
Third-IF poverty WERE the cause of crime, then what is the cause of crime amongst middle to wealthy people?
Leftist refuse to believe that morals have an outcome on society.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams
8 posted on
01/28/2011 6:27:18 AM PST by
mountn man
(The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
To: FredJake
ScienceBeDamned American.
9 posted on
01/28/2011 6:29:01 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(If Illegal Aliens are Undocumented Workers, then Thieves are Undocumented Shoppers.)
To: FredJake
Make socialism and its’ kin a crime then send all the socialists to that wonderful part of this country where there is very little gun crime, prison. To make it even more of a workers paradise, we could “equalize” the treatment of prisoners by limiting the spending per prisoner to the equivalent of what an individual with zero income would get from the Food stamp program. They'd be happy in their socialist paradise, we'd be happy with them locked up, what's the downside?
10 posted on
01/28/2011 6:29:53 AM PST by
Rashputin
(Barry is totally insane and being kept medicated and on golf courses to hide the fact)
To: FredJake
If that is the leftist logic, then let us go one step further, enact an Islamic theocracy like Saudi Arabia. They have very low crime and even lower HIV rate. Harmful cigarettes and alcohol is banned. Healthy, very little crime and very orderly society compared to the wild west free Americans./sarcasm
11 posted on
01/28/2011 6:30:55 AM PST by
Fee
To: FredJake
I hope that opponents of gun control will consider this modest, alternative proposal for reducing lethal shootings. Well, OK, let me consider it....
NO!
12 posted on
01/28/2011 6:36:10 AM PST by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: FredJake
...like they think we're all stupid. Look who got elected to POTUS. I would say their assumption may have some veracity to it.
13 posted on
01/28/2011 6:39:11 AM PST by
Dead Corpse
(III%. The last line in the sand)
To: FredJake
Scientific American is then neither.
14 posted on
01/28/2011 6:39:54 AM PST by
jdsteel
(I like the way the words "Palin for President" drive progressives absolutely crazy.)
To: FredJake
"...the elimination of private property in the means of production, the eradication of the exploitation of one person by another, and the resolution of social antagonisms led to the..." gulags.
Dear Skippy: under socialism, what you would consider forgivable and even meritorious become tantamount to high treason. Nipping something becomes theft from the State, right? Screwing around with the equipment, even to get it working better, wrecks the Plan and thus injures the State. No wonder as to why the punitive arm never lacks for work.
Consequently, why would any "good socialist" go to the bother of killing someone when it's much easier to rat 'em out? Amounts to the same thing in many cases, except the government does the killing for them.
To: FredJake
This guy is supposed to be one of the smart ones?
Claiming that Socialism is a “more equitable economic system”?
What Planet did they say they got this idiot from?
17 posted on
01/28/2011 6:51:04 AM PST by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: FredJake
Translation: there’s too much private killing. Killing should be the job of the state.
19 posted on
01/28/2011 7:06:20 AM PST by
lurk
To: FredJake
“I hope that opponents of gun control will consider this modest, alternative proposal for reducing lethal shootings.”
In keeping with the new, kinder, gentler public discourse, I’ve undertaken just such a consideration as Mr. Horgan suggests.
And, upon due reflection, I find his proposition to be fully and completely in opposition to the notions of free will and personal responsibility upon which free nations are founded.
20 posted on
01/28/2011 7:11:19 AM PST by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
To: FredJake
Science is dead. It has been hijacked by the radical commie left and now science must live a lie just like all progressives do.
Truth has no agenda...
21 posted on
01/28/2011 7:12:30 AM PST by
surfer
(To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
To: FredJake
Hey, that’s why Marxism-Leninism is called “Scientific Socialism”.
It’s all just science, citizen - you surely support science...
LOL! These socialist c***s*****s have absolutely no shame!
25 posted on
01/28/2011 7:20:16 AM PST by
headsonpikes
(Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism - "Who-whom?")
To: FredJake
Ah, yes!
Peace and civility come from Socialism.
Sure, we could do that.
Just think.....no guns, no crime, no fear of criminals.....no freedom, no independent thought, no risk taking or innovations.
We’d be docile and controlled.
Mark that last word: Controlled.
26 posted on
01/28/2011 7:39:07 AM PST by
Thumper1960
(A modern so-called "Conservative" is a shadow of a wisp of a vertebrate human being.)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
I canceled my Scientific America sub back in the late 90s, when they were already forfeiting their trustworthiness on matters such as global warming, perverting their "science" into politics.
I see they haven't gotten any better.
28 posted on
01/28/2011 7:59:37 AM PST by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson