[BuffaloJack]

I just cancelled my SA subscription.

[NewHampshireDuo]

I dropped mine in the early 90s when they moved from being a science magazine to a promoter of social justice.

[meyer]

I just cancelled my SA subscription.

About a year ago, I was visiting my sister and brother-in-law. He had, sitting on a table, a copy of a recent "Scientific American" magazine, with a big front cover story about global warming. I mentioned something about them supporting the myth of global warming. An argument ensued - found out that my brother in law is, in fact, a liberal/socialist. A limosine liberal to be exact.

You see, he made a good living before retiring at an early age, and did well with investments. He isn't quite to the level of Warren Buffett, but apparently shares some of the same socialist traits. It's the same old story from the wealthier libs - "I've got mine, screw you!"

[from occupied ga]

I just cancelled my SA subscription.

I cancelled mine decades ago. They went from a scientific (sort of) journal in the '60s to bird cage liner long ago. I'm surprised they're still around. Must sell a lot of subscriptions in NYC, DC, Boston, and other places where liberals labor under the delusion that they're intelligent.

[Pharmboy]

I had an SA subscription back in the '70s, and looked forward to every issue. I then let it lapse since in the '80s I needed to concentrate on reading for my job. In the 90s I re-subscribed but cancelled after reading a half dozen issues. They had clearly become a magazine run by greenies and commies.

I clearly remember the article that ended it for me: it was about genius-level intelligence, and how it had NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with genes. What twaddle...

[FreedomPoster]

I’m surprised you’ve kept it this long. They’ve had an agenda-driven Statist mindset that more than bled through into their articles for more than a decade, probably close to two.

[cycjec]

good for you, I haven’t had one to cancel.