To: Starman417
2 posted on
01/27/2011 2:00:53 PM PST by
Teflonic
To: Starman417
Its telling how the soldier said that if he hadn’t had his kukri on him, he would have remained a ‘silent spectator’. It says a lot about the wickedness of disarming law-abiding citizens when even a Gurkha appears to balk at the idea of taking 40 armed robbers with just his bare hands.
Even the psychological effect of just having a weapon would persuade more people to do the right thing when confronted with evil...
To: Starman417
That guy could never sneak up on you. The sound of his balls clanging together would give away his position.
4 posted on
01/27/2011 2:05:13 PM PST by
The_Sword_of_Groo
(<=== Proudly resides in occupied Georgia)
To: Starman417
What do you call a man with a Kukri?
"Sir."
6 posted on
01/27/2011 2:21:08 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
To: Starman417
Shouldn’t that be “Never bring a Gun to a Kukri fight?”
IIRC some of the robbers may have had handguns.
7 posted on
01/27/2011 2:40:26 PM PST by
magslinger
(Samuel Colt, feminist. Making women equal to men for over 150 years.)
To: Starman417
“I am proud to be able to prove that a Gorkha soldier with a khukuri is really a handful. I would have been a meek spectator had I not carried that khukuri,” he said.An unarmed man is just another victim.
I love my kukri. One of the best weapons and tools I own and it only cost about $20 bucks.
8 posted on
01/27/2011 2:40:40 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
To: Starman417
16 posted on
01/27/2011 3:28:15 PM PST by
Sergio
(An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson